SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATYA NARAYAN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent


$~A-6

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

W.P. (C) 10472/2020

SATYA NARAYAN & ORS.

.....Petitioners

Through:

Mr. Nikhil Palli, Advocate.

Versus

UNION OF INDIA & ORS.

.....Respondents

Through:

Mr. Akshay Makhija, Advocate

with Mr. Seerat Deep Singh and

Mr. Anirudh Shukla, Advocate for

UOI.

%

Date of Decision: 15thMarch, 2021

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON

J U D G M E N T

MANMOHAN, J (Oral):

CM APPL. 33125/2020 (for exemption)

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

Accordingly, present application stands disposed of.

W.P. (C) 10472/2020

1.

Present writ petition has been filed seeking a direction to the

respondents to extend the benefit of Old Pension Scheme to the

2021:DHC:949-DB

petitioners who were selected as Const./GD in Border Security Force

pursuant

to

Recruitment

held

in

November,

2003

by

Frontier

Headquarters BSF, Rajasthan and Gujarat in August, 2003 as the

petitioners are identically placed as the petitioners in the case of Tanaka

Ram & Ors. vs. Union of India & Ors., W.P.(C) No.6680/2017 having

been selected pursuant to the same selection process.

2.

Learned counsel for petitioners states that batchmates of most of

the p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top