$~A-14 (2019)

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision: 3^rd January, 2022

+

W.P.(C) 5002/2019

BHIKAM MASIH

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Sarfaraz Khan, Advocate.

versus

M/S TRIG DETECTIVES PVT. LTD.

..... Respondent

Through:

None.

CORAM:

JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH

Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through video conferencing.

2. None appears for the Respondent/Management. Counter affidavit has

also not yet been filed. It is noticed from the record that the Respondent had

entered appearance on 6^th March, 2020, and thereafter, has not appeared at

all in this matter. Vide order dated 25^th January, 2021, the right to file the

counter affidavit was closed by the Registrar. Despite the same, one more

opportunity was thereafter granted, vide order dated 10^th March, 2021. Even

so, none is appearing on behalf of the Respondent and counter affidavit has

not been filed.

3. Mr. Khan, ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioner/Workman submits

that the Workman in this case had filed his claim against the

Respondent/Management. However, due to certain reasons, he could not

appear before the Labour Court, leading to