SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SWATANTRA KUMAR JAYSAWAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR. – Respondent


W.P.(CRL) 1904/2021

Page 1 of 12

(VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCING)

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on

: 16.11.2021

%

Pronounced on : 03.01.2022

+

W.P.(CRL.) 1904/2021

SWATANTRA KUMAR JAYSAWAL

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Manoj Chaudhary and Mr. Sachin

Anand, Adv.

Petitioner in person.

versus

STATE & ANR.

.... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rajesh Mahajan, ASC with Ms.

Jyoti Babbar, Adv.

Mr. Lalit Valecha, Adv. for R-2

R-2 in person.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

ORDER

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1.

The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under

Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the

Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for quashing and cancelling the FIR

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000048

W.P.(CRL) 1904/2021

Page 2 of 12

No. 219/2021 under Section 376/323/506 IPC registered at P.S.

Patparganj Industrial Area and all the proceedings thereof.

2.

Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 25.06.2021 an

information from PCR vide DD No.54A was received at PS Patparganj

Industrial Area, wherein it was reported that Complainant was not

telling

anything

about

complaint

but

asking

for

urgen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top