SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TINIMO EFERE WOWO – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-2677/2020



Foreign nationals are not barred from bail in NDPS cases if they make out a case in their favor, and the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act do not apply to controlled substances.

Headnote:

BAIL - NDPS ACT - CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE - FOREIGN NATIONAL - [SUMMARY] The court granted bail to a foreign national accused of possessing controlled substances under the NDPS Act, holding that the rigors of Section 37 of the Act did not apply to controlled substances and that foreign nationals were not barred from bail if they made out a case in their favor.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, a foreign national, was arrested for possessing 3.5 kg of pseudoephedrine, a controlled substance under the NDPS Act, and 15 gm of cocaine. He was charged under Sections 9A and 25A of the NDPS Act, as well as Section 14 of the Foreigners Act and Section 471 IPC.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the petitioner was not entitled to parity with other co-accused persons who had been released on bail, as they had not been charged under the offense of forgery and cheating. However, the court held that the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply to the petitioner's case, as the substance recovered was a controlled substance and not a narcotic drug or psychotropic substance. The court also held that foreign nationals were not barred from bail if they made out a case in their favor.

Issues: Whether the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act applied to the petitioner's case; Whether foreign nationals were barred from bail in NDPS cases.

Ratio Decidendi: The court relied on the judgments in Gudikanti Narasimhulu and Others Vs. Public Prosecutor and Sartori Livio vs. State to hold that foreign nationals were not barred from bail if they made out a case in their favor. The court also relied on several judgments of the Delhi High Court to hold that the rigors of Section 37 of the NDPS Act did not apply to controlled substances.

Final Decision: The court granted bail to the petitioner on his furnishing personal bond in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- with two solvent sureties each of the like amount.

BAIL APPLN. 2677/2020

Page 1 of 9

(VIA VIDEO-CONFERENCING)

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on

: 20.12.2021

%

Pronounced on : 05.01.2022

+

BAIL APPLN. 2677/2020

TINIMO EFERE WOWO

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Vijay Bishnoi, Mr. Abhishek

Gautam and Mr. Amar Phogat, Advs.

versus

THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI

.... Respondent

Through:

Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State

with SI Manish Kumar.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

ORDER

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1.

The present bail application has been filed by the petitioner

under Section 439 Cr.P.C. seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 33/2018

under Section 9/21/25A of NDPS Act & under Section 471 IPC &

Section 14 of the Foreigners Act registered at P.S. Crime Branch,

Delhi.

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000080

BAIL APPLN. 2677/2020

Page 2 of 9

2.

Briefly stated, the facts of the case are that on 09.02.2018, a

secret information was received by ASI Anil Kumar that one person

namely Vinay Sharma would come at about 4:30 PM to supply Pseudo

Ephedrine to a person near Chanakya Market Bus Stand, Janakpuri,

Delhi. On this information, a raid was conducted and one accused

namely Vinay Sharma was apprehended and 10 Kg. Pseudo-Ephedrine

was recovered from his possession. On the basis of above recovery,

the present FIR was registered. During investigation, accused Vinay

Sharma was arrested and he was interrogated and he disclosed that he

has procured the recovered substance from one Piyush of Jirakpur near

Chandigarh. It was also disclosed by the arrested accused that he can

take the police to Chandigarh and Jirakpur to point out the places,

where the supplier namely Piyush used to meet him to deliver the drugs

to him.

3.

During PC remand accused Vinay Sharma was taken to Jirakpur,

Punjab to apprehend the supplier of recovered pseudo-ephedrine. On

this, a call was made on the phone of source of contraband namely

Piyush Srivastava by accused Vinay Sharma and he was asked to meet

him near Sethi Dhaba, Jirakpur, Punjab. On this, source Piyush came

near Sethi Dhaba, Ambala road, Jirakpur and he was apprehended from

there. After serving notice under section 50 NDPS Act, cursory search

of accused Piyush was conducted but nothing incriminating thing could

be recovered from his possession. But he confessed to have delivered

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000080

BAIL APPLN. 2677/2020

Page 3 of 9

the recovered substance to accused Vinay Sharma. On this, accused

Piyush Srivastava was arrested in the present case and intimation

regarding his arrest was conveyed to local police station. He was

interrogated there but he did not co-operate and did not disclose as to

from where he has procured the recovered pseudo-ephedrine. After

this, he was brought to Delhi and again subjected to sustained

interrogation. During interrogation he disclosed that he has procured

the recovered Pseudo Ephedrine from one Praveen of Chandigarh, who

is known to him as he used to purchase medicine from him. Accused

Piyush also disclosed that he has kept the remaining quantity of Pseudo

Ephedrine which he procured from Praveen Kumar in his office at

Panchkula, Haryana. He told that he didn't know the complete address

of Praveen but he can help police in tracing from their meeting points.

4.

Four days PC remand of accused Piyush Srivastava was obtained

and he was taken to Zirakpur, Punjab and Chandigarh at the address of

the alleged source namely Parveen Gupta but Parveen Gupta was not

found present there. On this, a notice was served to Mohan Lal Gupta

(brother of alleged source Parveen Gupta). Search of the office of the

accused situated at Phase-I, Industrial Area, Panchkula, Haryana was

also made but nothing incriminating could be recovered from there.

One day more PC remand of accused Piyush Srivastva was obtained

and on his pointing out 1.5 Kg. Pseudo-ephedrine was recovered on

16.02.2018 from Singhu Border, Narela, Delhi.

This

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top