SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUMER SINGH SALKAN – Appellant
Versus
VIKRAM SINGH MANN & ORS – Respondent


CM(M) 37/2019

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Reserved on: 16th December, 2021

Pronounced on: 10th January, 2022

+

CM(M) 37/2019

SUMER SINGH SALKAN

..... Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Malavika Rajkotia with Mr.

Mayank Grover, Advocates.

Versus

VIKRAM SINGH MANN & ORS

..... Respondents

Through:

Dr. Reema Salkan, R-2 in person and

Power of Attorney Holder for R-1.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

JUDGMENT

AMIT BANSAL, J.

1.

The present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India

seeks setting aside of (i) the order dated 6th February, 2018, whereby an

application filed on behalf of the respondent no. 1/defendant no. 7 under

Order I Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) seeking

deletion from the array of parties has been allowed; and (ii) the order dated

12th July, 2018, whereby the review filed on behalf of the petitioner/plaintiff

[hereinafter ‘plaintiff’] against the order dated 6th February, 2018 has been

dismissed.

2.

Notice was issued in the present petition on 11th January, 2019 and

pursuant thereto, counter affidavit has been filed on behalf of the

respondents no. 1 and 2. Arg

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top