SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH KANSAL – Appellant
Versus
SYNERGY TRADECO NV – Respondent


CS(COMM) 29/2022

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 17th January, 2022.

+

CS(COMM) 29/2022

SATISH KANSAL

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Mr. Abhishek Aggarwal, Advocate.

Versus

SYNERGY TRADECO NV & ANR.

..... Defendants

Through:

Mr. Ajay Monga with Mr. Ateev

Mathur and Mr. Amol Sharma

Advocates for HDFC Bank/R-2.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]

JUDGMENT

AMIT BANSAL, J. (Oral)

IA No.719/2022(for exemption)

1.

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2.

The application is disposed of.

IA No.720/2022(u/S. 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015)

3.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

IA No.718/2022(u/O.XXXIX R.1&2 CPC)

4.

By way of the present application under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 of

the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), the plaintiff seeks restraint order

against payments to the defendant no.1 of amounts covered under the Letter

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000201

CS(COMM) 29/2022

Page 2 of 10

of Credit (LC) No.027LC01212850007 da

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top