HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SHRI ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR MALIK – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-2312/2021
BAIL APPLN. 2312/2021
Page 1 of 17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of decision: 01st FEBRUARY, 2022
IN THE MATTER OF:
+
BAIL APPLN. 2312/2021
SHRI ARUN KUMAR @ ARUN KUMAR MALIK ..... Petitioner
Through
Mr. Ashwin Vaish, Advocate
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through
Mr. Amit Prasad, SPP for the State
with Mr. Ayodhya Prasad, Advocate
and SI Santosh Gupta, Crime Branch
Mr. Mehmood Pracha , Advocate
with Mr.Sanawar Choudhary and Mr.
Jatin
Bhatt,
Advocates
for
the
complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J.
1.
The petitioner seeks bail in FIR No. 70/2020 dated 27.02.2020
registered at PS Bhajanpura for offences under Sections 147, 148, 149, 302,
307, 396, 436, 455, 201, 188, 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860
2.
The FIR relates to the violence that took place in the National Capital
Territory of Delhi in the month of February 2020.
3.
The brief facts leading to the instant Bail Application are that on
25.02.2020, around 11:00 AM., the complainant had gone to purchase milk
from a nearby shop when he received a call from his son Asif informing him
that a huge crowd of around 100 people had gathered near their house in
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000372
BAIL APPLN. 2312/2021
Page 2 of 17
support of NRC and CAA. The crowd was chanting slogans of “Jai Shree
Ram”. The crowd later entered their house after breaking open the locks, and
set it on fire. It is stated that the complainant’s family members and
employees rushed to the top floor of the house. The complainant’s family
members and workers were safely rescued from the roof of his residence,
which was made possible by the rescue operation launched by the police in
support with the locals of the vicinity.
4.
It is stated that the complainant’s mother, Smt. Akbari, who was 85
years old could not reach the rooftop due to her age. After extinguishing the
fire, her body was found lying on a folding bed and was recovered from the
second floor. She was taken to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital, where she was
declared brought dead vide MLC No. D-45. A Post Mortem was conducted
at GTB Hospital itself and vide PM Report No. 345/2020 dated 28.02.2020,
the cause of death was opined as Asphyxia as a result of an ante-mortem
inhalation of smoke. It is further stated that the crowd looted Rs. 8,00,000 in
cash and a box containing gold and silver jewellery and other valuable
articles from their residence
5.
The investigation of the said case was transferred from North East to
Special Investigation Team-II, Crime Branch, Delhi and subsequently to
Special Investigation Unit-I, Crime Branch, Delhi vide order No. 8266-
74/AC-III/C&T/PHQ dated 27.02.2020 and No. 216/S)/DCP/Crime (SIU &
ISC) dated 04.03.2020.Theinvestigation was undertaken by Insp. Pankaj
Arora.
6.
The petitioner was arrested on 11.03.2020 and has been in custody
since then. The chargesheet was filed on 07.06.2020 and on 06.04.2021, the
charges were framed by the Trial Court.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/000372
BAIL APPLN. 2312/2021
Page 3 of 17
7.
The petitioner had filed Bail Application No. 399/2020 before the
Court of Sessions Judge which was dismissed vide order dated 06.08.2020.
Thereafter, another bail application vide IA No. 04/2021 in SC No. 17/2021
was filed before the Court of Sessions Judge which was subsequently
dismissed vide order dated 29.04.2021.
8.
Mr. Ashwin Vaish, the learned counsel for the petitioner contended
that the accused has been falsely implicated in the present matter and that
there exists no evidence which can prove the connection of the Petitioner to
the incident beyond reasonable doubt. He submitted that the FIR was
registered on 27.02.2020, that is, two days after the incident occurred and
the name of the accused is nowhere mentioned therein. He further submitted
that the statements of the eye witness