SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DEEPAK GOYAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Signature Not Verified

Digitally Signed

By:SANGEETA ANAND

Signing Date:22.02.2022

18:15:20

Page 1 of 15

`

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

BAIL APPLN. 4231/2020

Reserved on

: 31.01.2022

Date of Decision : 22.02.2022

IN THE MATTER OF:

DEEPAK GOYAL

..... Petitioner

Through: Mr. Sanjay Hedge, Sr. Advocate with

Mr. Mukesh Rana, Ms. Mamta and

Mr.Randhir Kumar, Advocates

Versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through: Mr. Amit Chadha, APP for State

with Inspector Govind Singh, Police Station

Uttam Nagar

Mr. Maninder Singh, Sr. Advocate with Ms.

Smriti Asmita, Advocate for complainant

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

(VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING)

J U D G M E N T

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J.

1. The present bail application has been filed under Section 439

Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicant seeking regular bail in FIR No.

229/2013 registered under Sections 420/467/468/471/34 IPC at Police

Station Uttam Nagar, Delhi.

2. Mr. Sanjay Hedge, learned Senior Counsel for the applicant,

contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITAT

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top