DELHI HIGH COURT
MOHD. AKIL – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-3463/2021
BAIL APPLN. 3463/2021 Page 1 of 5
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on :09.03.2022
%
Pronounced on: 13.04.2022
+
BAIL APPLN. 3463/2021 AND CRL.M.A. 14856/2021
MOHD. AKIL
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Kundan Kumar, Advocate.
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Rajni Gupta, APP for the State
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
O R D E R
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.
1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 439 Cr.P.C.
seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 124/2017 under Sections 21/29 NDPS
Act registered at Police Station Crime Branch (West), Delhi.
2. In brief the facts of the case are that on 27/07/2017, SI Vinod Kumar
of Narcotics Cell, Crime Branch received secret information that two
persons namely Nabi Alam @ Abbas and Md. Akil (present petitioner) both
R/o Badaiyun, UP, are engaged in the supply of Heroin in Delhi and they
would be coming at Red Light, Chanakya Place, near transformer, on the
road leading towards Uttam Nagar, Delhi between 02:00 PM to 02:30 PM
for delivery of Heroin. The secret information was conveyed to the Inspector
and ACP/N.Cell, Crime Branch and reduced into writing vide DD No. 12
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001318
BAIL APPLN. 3463/2021 Page 2 of 5
dated 27/07/2017 and complied with the mandates of Section 42 NDPS Act.
Thereafter, a raiding team was constituted and trap was laid near Red Light,
Chankya Place, Uttam Nagar, Delhi. At about 02:30 PM, two persons,
namely Nabi Alam @ Abbas and Md. Akil (present petitioner), were
apprehended at the instance of the secret informer. Notices under Section 50
NDPS Act were duly served upon them and they were made aware about
their legal rights but both the persons refused to avail their legal rights i.e. to
be searched before any Gazetted Officer or Magistrate. Therefore, cursory
search of Nabi Alam @ Abbas was conducted first during which 250 grams
Heroin was recovered from the pant worn by him, while 50 grams Heroin
was recovered from the pant of the present petitioner. The recovered Heroin
was seized after taking out samples as per due process and FIR No. 124/17,
under Section 21/29 NDPS Act was registered at PS Crime Branch and
investigation was entrusted to Inspector RajniKant Sharma, who arrested the
present petitioner and the co-accused.
3. I have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned APP for
the State and perused the status report filed on behalf of the State.
4. It is submitted by counsel for petitioner that petitioner is in JC since
27.07.2017. It is further submitted that quantity recovered from the
petitioner is intermediate quantity and not commercial quantity so, the rigors
of Section 37 NDPS Act is not applicable. It is further submitted that the
petitioner was arrested on the disclosure statement of the co-accused and has
been falsely implicated. It is further submitted that petitioner has deep roots
in the society and has family to support. Learned counsel for the petitioner
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001318
BAIL APPLN. 3463/2021 Page 3 of 5
further submitted that as per the allegations in the complaint, the element of
conspiracy with the other co-accused person is missing. He further submits
that chargesheet has been filed and petitioner is no more required for the
investigation purposes. It is also submitted that petitioner is not involved in
any other case except the present FIR.
5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed reliance on the
following judgments:
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.