SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SOURABH KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


BAIL APPLN. 3972/2021Page 1 of 5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on : 22.02.2022

% Pronounced on : 19.04.2022

+

BAIL APPLN. 3972/2021

SOURABH KHATRI

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Varun Mudgil, Advocate.

versus

THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

.... Respondent

Through: Dr.M P Singh, APP for the State.

Mr. Vikram Singh and Mr. Yatender

Singh, Advocates for complainant.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

ORDER

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1. This petitioner has been filed by the petitioner under Section 439

Cr.P.C seeking regular bail in case FIR No. 70/2020 under Section

302/120B IPC read with Section 25/27/54/59 of the Arms Act

registered at Police Station Ranhola.

2. In brief, the facts of the case are that the present FIR bearing no.

70/2020 was registered on the statement of Sachin Narwal on

27.1.2020. In his statement he alleged that on 26.1.2020 at about 10.30

pm, he was sitting in the office of father of Sahil Lakra with his friends

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001465

BAIL APPLN. 397

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top