HIGH COURT OF DELHI
MANISH KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-145/2022
BAIL APPLN. 145/2022 Page 1 of 8
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on : 09.03.2022
% Pronounced on : 22.04.2022
+
BAIL APPLN 145/2022 AND CRL.M.A. 890/2022 & CRL.M.A.
4103/2022
MANISH KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Jatin Kumar, Mr. Manish Kumar
and Mr. Ashish Shukla, Advocates.
Versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State
with SI Seema Bhati, PS Ashok
Nagar.
Ms. Tanya Agarwal, Advocate from
DHCLSC and Ms. Eliza, Advocate
for the complainant.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
ORDER
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001466
BAIL APPLN. 145/2022 Page 2 of 8
1. This is a petition filed by the petitioner under Section 438 Cr.P.C.
seeking anticipatory bail in FIR No. 585/2021 under Sections
376(2)(n)/377/328/506 IPC registered at P.S. New Ashok Nagar.
2. In brief the facts of the case are that the instant FIR No. 585/2021
dated 18.11.2021, U/s 376(2)(n)/377/328/506 IPC was registered at P.S.
New Ashok Nagar, on the basis of Zero FIR No. 0001/21 dated 07.10.21 U/s
376(2)(n)/377/328/506 IPC registered at P.S. Seelampur, Delhi, which was
lodged on the complaint of the prosecutrix. The prosecutrix has alleged that
she met a boy namely Manish Kumar Mishra @ Monu (Petitioner herein)
S/o Lai Bahadur Mishra R/o Pure Durgadeen Tiwari, Bahorikpur,
Purabgaon, P.S Gauriganj, Amethi Distt, U.P., through Facebook on
05.08.2019 and thereafter, they started talking with each other. In the first
week of September 2019, Manish called her to go to Dehradun for
celebrating his birthday, to which she agreed and on reaching Dehradun,
they checked in to a hotel where she was provided breakfast by Manish and
after consuming it, she felt uncomfortable and she laid down on bed for rest
but she fell asleep. After waking up, she found herself undressed and
covered in only bedcover. When she asked Manish what had happened, he
said that he had engaged in sexual relations with her and he convinced her
that he loves her and would marry her. After a while, he had also called her
to his rented room i.e., H. No. B-44, New Ashok Nagar, Delhi, where he
forcefully made sexual relations with her by blackmailing her and showing
her obscene photos and videos of her with him and also, threatened her that
he would send it to her family members if she refuses to have sexual
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001466
BAIL APPLN. 145/2022 Page 3 of 8
relations with him. Thereafter, he also kept her with him in a rented flat at
H. No. 63/64, Room No.16, U- Block, DLF Phase III, Gurgaon, from
23.10.2019 to 19.03.2020 and he used to threaten her that if she will not
follow her instructions, he would kill her and her family and also, continued
to sexually and physically assault her. He kept sexually assaulting her till
10.03.2021, but did not marry her. Further, he continued contacting her
through phone calls and used to ask her to meet him and threatened her that
he would harm her if she refused to meet him. Hence, the instant FIR was
lodged on 18.11.2021.
3. I have heard the learned counsel for the petitioner, learned APP for
the State assisted by the Ld. DHCLSC counsel for the complainant and
perused the status report filed by the state.
4. It is submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that petitioner
has been falsely implicated in this case and the relationship between the
petitioner and prosecutrix was consensual. It is further subm