HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ROHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
UNION OFINDIA AND OTHERS – Respondent
W.P.(C)-15051/2021
W.P.(C) 15051/2021
Page 1 of 20
$~2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Reserved on:
March 29th, 2022
Decided on:
April 26, 2022
+
W.P.(C) 15051/2021
ROHIT KUMAR
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. M.D. Jangra, Advocate.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & OTHERS
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Nitin Khanna, Advocate.
%
CORAM:
HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT
HON‟BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
JUDGMENT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
1.
The petitioner has filed the present writ petition under Articles
226-227 of the Constitution of India for issuance of appropriate writ
against cancellation of his candidature due to incorrect mentioning of
date of issuance of OBC Certificate as 10.05.2021 in place of
10.05.2018 while submitting online application for appointment to
the post of Navik (DB) in Indian Coast Guard and to allow the
petitioner to participate in the selection process as the petitioner has
cleared the written examination (Computer Based Test), Physical
Fitness Test (PFT), etc.
2.
The brief facts as arising from the petition are that the Indian
Coast Guard, Ministry of Defence had issued advertisement for
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001513
W.P.(C) 15051/2021
Page 2 of 20
filling up the posts of Navik (General Duty), Navik (Domestic
Branch) and Yantrik01/2022 Batch and for the post of Navik
(Domestic Branch),50 vacancies (23-UR(Gen), 05-EWS, 17-OBC,
02-ST and 03-SC) were advertised. The petitioner was eligible for the
post of Navik (Domestic Branch) and applied online in OBC
category with Registration No. 2107NDB0016887.The petitioner was
issued e-admit card for Stage-I i.e., Written Examination (Computer
Based Online Examination) scheduled to be held on 28.09.2021 at IT
Web Solutions, Industrial Area, Phase I, Chandigarh. The petitioner
was declared successful in the written examination and shortlisted for
Stage-II i.e. Physical Fitness Test and document verification
scheduled for 16.11.2021 at Sector-22, Noida. The petitioner cleared
physical fitness test and was called for document verification. The
petitioner during document verification was asked to sign on a paper
as his candidature was stated to be cancelled on the date of issuance
of the OBC Certificate as it was not matching with the date of
issuance of the OBC Certificate as mentioned in the application form.
The petitioner has mentioned the date of issuance of OBC Certificate
as 10.05.2021, at the time of filling up of online application due to
inadvertent typographical error in place of 10.05.2018. The petitioner
showed OBC Certificates dated 10.05.2018 and 10.05.2021 but the
concerned authority did not consider the stand of the petitioner. The
cancellation of candidature of the petitioner was arbitrary, mala fide
and against the principles of natural justice. The petitioner was not
even considered for General (UR) Category. The petitioner has
submitted a representation on 30.11.2021 for explaining error caused
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001513
W.P.(C) 15051/2021
Page 3 of 20
by inadvertent typographical error and asked permission to
participate in selection process which was arbitrarily rejected
verbally. The petitioner challenged the said acts of the respondents on
the grounds that he cannot be denied for further participation in the
selection process, the respondents had acted in violation of Articles
14 & 16 of the Constitution of India, the respondents did not consider
inadvertent typographical error in mentioning date of issuance of
OBC Certificate at time the of submission of online application, the
petitioner was not considered for General (UR) Category, the
respondents acted arbitrarily, illegally and against principles of
natural justice while cancelling verbally the candidature of the
petitioner on 16.11.2021 during document verification, the
respondents have no right to deprive the petitioner of being