SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MEENAKSHI MANNA – Appellant
Versus
SMT SURITI MANNA & ANR. – Respondent


C.R.P. 78/2021 Page 1 of 8

$~23

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of decision: 12 May, 2022

+

C.R.P. 78/2021

MEENAKSHI MANNA

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

N.K.

Kantawala

and

Mr.Satyender Chahar, Advs.

versus

SMT SURITI MANNA & ANR.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr.Pranaynath Jha, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

YASHWANT VARMA, J. (ORAL)

1.

This revision is directed against an order dated 31 July 2019 passed

by the Trial Judge rejecting an application purporting to be under Order XV

Rule 1 of the Civil Procedure Code, 1908 [the Code]. The order emanates

from a suit for possession, recovery of mesne profit for use and occupation

as instituted by the plaintiff petitioner against the respondents. From the

record, it transpires that after the filling of a written statement, the

petitioners filed an application under Order XII Rule 6 of the Code. That

application came to be dismissed by the Trial Judge by an order of 04 July

2019. Although the aforesaid order was initially assailed by filling a revision

petition before this Court, the

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top