Crl.M.C.2312/2022 Page 1 of 6

$~10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

CRL.M.C. 2312/2022

YOGESH SARAOGI & ORS.

... Petitioners

Through:

Mr.Bikram Chand Sharma and

Mr. Raj Kumar, Advocates

along with petitioners.

versus

STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) AND

ANR.

…. Respondents

Through:

Mr.Panna Lal Sharma, APP for

State with ASI R.P.Singh, PS

Laxmi Nagar

Mr. Ashok Jain and Ms. Ishita

Singhal for Respondent No.2

with Complainant Isha Jain in

person

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

O R D E R

%

19.05.2022

CRL.M.A. 9779/2022 (exemption)

1. Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.

2. The application stands disposed of.

CRL.M.C. 2312/2022

3. The instant petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal

Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter “Cr.P.C.”) has been filed by the

petitioners praying for quashing of FIR bearing No. 34/2018 registered

at Police Station Shakarpur, Delhi for offences punishable under

Sections 406/498A/354B/506/313/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860

(hereinafter “IPC”).

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001971

Crl.M.C.2312/2022 Page 2 of 6

4. Notice. Mr. Panna Lal Sharma, learned APP accepts notice on

behalf of the State.

5. All the petitioners are present before this Court and have been

identified by their counsel Mr. Bikran Chand Sharma, and

Investigating Officer (IO) ASI R.P.Singh from Police Station Laxmi

Nagar.

6. On a query made by this Court, respondent no.2 who has been

identified by the IO, has categorically stated that she has entered into

compromise out of her own free will and without any pressure,

coercion or threat. It is also stated by respondent No.2 that the entire

dispute has been amicably settled between the parties.

7. The brief facts of the case are that the petitioner no.1 and

respondent no.2 got married to each other on 11.02.2006 at Delhi

according to Hindu rites and ceremonies.

8. That soon after the marriage, the parties residing separately since

10.02.2017, thereafter, the respondent No.2 filed a complaint which

was subsequently registered into FIR No. 34/2018 dated 17.01.2018

U/s 406/498A/354B/506/313/34 IPC, P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi. As per

order dated 23.07.2019 of this Court, parties have settled all disputes.

As per settlement, petitioner had agreed to pay a sum of Rs.

52,00,000/- to the respondent No.2 for grant of motion of divorce as

full and final settlement.

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/001971

Crl.M.C.2312/2022 Page 3 of 6

9. The petitioner no. 1 had paid a sum of Rs. 39,00,000/- in three

installments in the following manner:

a. First installment of Rs. 13 Lakhs deposited with the Registrar

General, Delhi High Court and released to Respondent no. 2.

b. Second installment of Rs. 13 Lakhs paid to Respondent no. 2

in the first motion petition.

c. Third installment of Rs. 13 lakhs paid to Respondent no. 2 in

the second motion petition.

d. Fourth/Final installment to be paid to Respondent no. 2 at the

time of recording her statement for quashing of the FIR before

the Hon’ble High Court at New Delhi.

10. As per order passed by this Court on 23.7.2019, the parties have

settled all their grievances amicably, hence the respondent no.2 does

not want to continue the proceeding emanating from the FIR 34/2018

U/s 406/498A/354B/506/313/34 IPC, P.S. Shakarpur, Delhi against

the petitioners.

11. Today, the complainant is present in person who, states that she

has received the last and final instalment of Rs. 13 Lakhs today and

has no objection if the FIR is quashed by this Court. It is prayed that

the instant