HIGH COURT OF DELHI
REDI PATRI FOOTPATH VIKRRATA EKATA MUNCH AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-8066/2021
W.P.(C) 8066/2021
$~2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
Date of Decision: 21.09.2021
%
W.P.(C) 8066/2021 and CM Appl. 32736/2021
REDI PATRI FOOTPATH VIKRATA
EKATA MUNCH AND ORS.
.....Appellant
Through:
Mr. N.K. Sahoo, Advocate
versus
SOUTH DELHI MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Tushar Sannu, Standing Counsel
with Ms. Ankita Bhadouriya&Mr.Subham Jain,
Advocates for the respondent No.1/SDMC with
Bhagirath Pandit, Licensing Officer, SDMC,
Mr. Naushad Ahmed Khan, ASC Civil GNCTD for
Respondent No. 2 and 3 with Mr. Zahid, Ms.
Manisha Chauhan, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIPIN SANGHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
JASMEET SINGH, J. (ORAL)
1.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner No. 1, Society
espousing the cause of squatters and vendors. Petitioner No.1 is a society
registered under the Societies Registration Act, having its office atNo. A-
138, Gali No -5, Sonia Vihar, New Delhi. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 37 are the
members of petitioner No.1. The petition has been filed by the petitioners
seeking the following prayer:
a)
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002182
W.P.(C) 8066/2021
b)
this Hon‟ble Court deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
2.
The case set up by the petitioners in a nutshell is that petitioner No. 2
to 37, have been squatting on their respective places of squatting, being
fixed site at Sethi Chowk and SatarajRaj Park of Central Market, Lajpat
Nagar, Pushpa Market, New Delhi. They have been eking out their
livelihood and making the ends meet of their families and dependents by
doing small trade from their respective places of squatting at Sethi Chowk,
Shakti Raj Park, Central Market, Lajpat Nagar and Pushpa Market, New
Delhi. Their places of squatting are neither causing any hindrance nor
obstructing the transit of the general public. Petitioner Nos. 2 to 33 have
been squatting at their respective sites for periods ranging from 12 to 20
years and, in fact, some of the petitioners are members of the “Eyes and Ears
Scheme” floated by Delhi Police to provide information regarding
unattended objects and the movements of suspicious and unidentified
persons in the locality.
3.
On 05.03.2014, the Streets Vendors Act, 2014 came into force. The
Act provides that Town Vending Committee shall after conducting a survey,
recommend for declaration of an area as a vending and/or a non-vending
zone. The broad principles to be followed by the Local Authority- while
preparing a Street Vending Plan u/s 21 of the Act, for declaring a
vending/non-vending zone under the First Schedule of the Street Vendors
Act, 2014 are:
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002182
W.P.(C) 8066/2021
“ THE FIRST SCHEDULE
PLAN FOR STREET VENDING
(1) ……………..
(2) ………………
street vending, subject to the following principles, namely:—
a)Any existing market, or a natural market as identified
under the survey shall not be declared as non-
vendingZone;
displace the minimum percentage of street vendors;
c)Overcrowding of any place shall not be a basis for
declaring any area as non-vending zone provided that
restriction may be placed on issuing certificate of vending
in such areas to persons not identified as street vendors in
the survey.
future growth, by adopting such norms as may be necessary;
e) Till such time as the survey has not been carried out and
the plan for street vending has not been formulated, no zone
shall be declared as no vending zone.”(emphasis supplied)
4.
On 17.09.2019, the Town Vending Committee-1, Central Zone was
constituted as per Gazette notification and petitioner No. 1 was nominated as
a member of Town Vending Committee-1(hereinafter called TVC-1).
5.
On 07.08.2020, the Ministry of Housing and Urban Affairs announced
a loan scheme for squatters and hawkers affected due to COVID-19. The
PM Street Ven