HIGH COURT OF DELHI
M/S G.S BERAR AND CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
M/S TRANS ASIAN INDUSTRIES EXPOSITIONS PVT. LTD – Respondent
CM(M)-160/2022
CM(M) 160/2022
Page 1 of 10
$~17
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CM(M) 160/2022 & CM APPL. 26958/2022
M/S G.S BERAR AND CO. PVT. LTD. & ANR...... Petitioners
Through:
Mr. Saurabh Prakash and Mr.
Anant Aditya Patro, Advs.
versus
M/S TRANS ASIAN INDUSTRIES EXPOSITIONS PVT.
LTD
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Lakshay Dhamija and Mr.
Sahil Dutta, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR
O R D E R (ORAL)
%
01.06.2022
CM APPL. 26958/2022 in CM(M) 160/2022
1.
By this application, preferred in CM(M) 160/2022, the
petitioners seek initiation of proceedings, against the respondent,
under Section 340 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr PC).
2.
Section 340 Cr PC reads thus:
“340. Procedure in cases mentioned in section 195.
(1)
When, upon an application made to it in this
behalf or otherwise, any Court is of opinion that it is
expedient in the interests of justice that an inquiry
should be made into any offence referred to in clause
(b) of sub- section (1) of section 195, which appears to
have been committed in or in relation to a proceeding
in that Court or, as the case may be, in respect of a
document produced or given in evidence in a
proceeding in that Court, such Court may, after such
preliminary inquiry, if any, as it thinks necessary,-
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002202
CM(M) 160/2022
Page 2 of 10
(a)
record a finding to that effect;
(b)
make a complaint thereof in writing;
(c)
send it to a Magistrate of the first class
having jurisdiction;
(d)
take
sufficient
security
for
the
appearance
of
the
accused
before
such
Magistrate, or if the alleged offence is non-
bailable and the Court thinks it necessary so to
do, send the accused in custody to such
Magistrate; and
(e)
bind over any person to appear and give
evidence before such Magistrate.
(2)
The power conferred on a Court by sub- section
(1) in respect of an offence may, in any case where that
Court has neither made a complaint under sub- section
(1) in respect of that offence nor rejected an application
for the making of such complaint, be exercised by the
Court to which such former Court is subordinate within
the meaning of sub- section (4) of section 195.
(3)
A complaint made under this section shall be
signed,-
(a)
where the Court making the complaint is
a High Court, by such officer of the Court as the
Court may appoint;
(b)
in any other case, by the presiding officer
of the Court.
(4)
In this section," Court" has the same meaning as
in section 195.”
3.
Clearly, Section 340 Cr PC relates back to Section 195 (1)(b) of
the Cr PC.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002202
CM(M) 160/2022
Page 3 of 10
4.
On a query from the Court as to the provision of the IPC,
amongst the several provisions envisaged by Section 195 (1) (b) of
Cr.PC, that the petitioners seek to invoke against the respondent,
learned Counsel for the petitioners submits that he is invoking Section
209 of the IPC, which reads as under:
“209.
Dishonestly making false claim in Court.—
Whoever fraudulently or dishonestly, or with intent to injure
or annoy any person, makes in a Court of Justice any claim
which he knows to be false, shall be punished with
imprisonment of either descrip-tion for a term which may
extend to two years, and shall also be liable to fine.
5.
Plainly read, Section 209 IPC applies only where a person
fraudulently or dishonestly makes a claim, in a Court, which he knows
to be false, with intent to injure or annoy any person. There are,
therefore, three ingredients in Section 209, viz. (i) the making, by the
6.
These three ingredients, plainly, have to be read cumulatively
and, in the absence of any one of the ingredients, even a prima facie
case for initiating proceedings under Section 340 Cr PC read with
Section 209 of the IPC cannot be said to be made out.