SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MUKISH – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


CRL.A.114/2020

Page 1 of 14

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Decided on: 19th May, 2022

+

CRL.A.114/2020

MUKISH

..... Appellant

Represented by:

Ms.Inderjeet Sidhu, Advocate

(DHCLSC).

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Represented by:

Mr.Tarang Srivastava, APP for

the State with SI Yogesh

Tanwar, PS Badarpur.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MUKTA GUPTA

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL)

CRL.M.A. 9812/2022 (Exemption)

1.

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

2.

Application is disposed of.

CRL.A. 114/2020

1.

The present is an appeal under Section 374(2) read with Section

383 of Cr.P.C. challenging the Judgment dated 28th November, 2019

and order on point of sentence dated 29th November, 2019 passed by

Sh. Gaurav Rao, learned Additional Sessions Judge-01 (POCSO),

South-East District, Saket Courts, New Delhi.

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002299

CRL.A.114/2020

Page 2 of 14

2.

The appellant was convicted for the offence punishable under

Section 6 of The Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act,

2012 (herein referred to as ‘POCSO A

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top