HIGH COURT OF DELHI
META PLATFORMS,INC. – Appellant
Versus
NOUFEL MALOL – Respondent
CS(COMM)-499/2020
CS(COMM.) 499/2020 Page 1 of 18
$~2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 06.07.2022
+
CS(COMM) 499/2020 & IA 8765/2021
META PLATFORMS, INC.
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr.Pravin Anand, Ms.Vaishali
Mittal, Mr.Siddhant Chamola,
Mr.Shivang
Sharma,
Advs.
(Mobile-9999052646)
versus
NOUFEL MALOL & ANR
..... Defendants
Through:
None
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA
NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (Oral)
1. This suit has been filed by the plaintiff praying inter-alia for a
decree of permanent injunction restraining the defendants from using
the mark „Facebake‟ and/or the domain name www.facebake.in; the
email IDs facebake.mail@gmail.com; facebake649@gmail.com, as
also for seeking rendition of accounts.
2. This Court, vide order dated 12.11.2020 was pleased to pass the
following ad-interim order:
“6. In the meanwhile, the defendant, his
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002524
CS(COMM.) 499/2020 Page 2 of 18
operating his website i.e. www.facebake.in.”
3. As none appeared for the defendant no.1, (who was the sole
defendant till that date), this Court confirmed the ad-interim order
dated 12.11.2020, vide the order of this Court dated 21.01.2021, and
further passed the following directions:
weeks.”
4. The plaintiff thereafter filed an application under Order XXXIX
Rule 2A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (in short, the „CPC‟),
being IA No.8765 of 2021, alleging therein that despite the above
orders being passed by this Court, the defendant no.1 incorporated a
company by the name of „Ehrlich Foods and Beverages Pvt. Ltd’ on
27.01.2021, and is one of its directors. The said company has
preferred a trade mark application bearing no. 4926784 under Class
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002524
CS(COMM.) 499/2020 Page 3 of 18
30, seeking the registration of a deceptively-similar mark
dated 30.03.2021.
5. The plaintiff also filed another application, being IA No. 10045
of 2021, under Order I Rule 10 of the CPC praying to implead the said
company as defendant no.2 in the suit.
6. The said company was then impleaded as the defendant no.2 in
the suit vide the order of the learned Joint Registrar (Judicial) dated
11.08.2021.
7. None appeared for the defendant no.2 in spite of service, thus,
even the defendant no.2 was proceeded ex-parte vide an order of this
Court dated 10.11.2021.
8. It is the case of the plaintiff that the plaintiff-company has been
incorporated in the United States of America and adopted Facebook,
which is a world-famous, social networking service. It also launched a
mobile application and website under the mark „Facebook‟ in 2004.
Some key products/features of the plaintiff under the mark „Facebook‟
include, for example, Facebook Profile, Facebook News Feed,
Facebook Messenger, Facebook Groups, Facebook Events, Facebook
Video, Facebook Photos, Facebook Pages, Facebook Shops (launched
in May, 2020) and Facebook Marketplace (launched in October,
2016).
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002524
CS(COMM.) 499/2020 Page 4 of 18
9. The plaintiff has given details of registrations obtained by it in
its marks (hereinafter referred to as „Facebook marks‟) as under:
Sl. No.
Trademark
Class
Reg. No.
Reg. Date
Valid upto
1. FACEBOOK
35 & 38
1436663 22 March
2006 22 March
2026 2. THE FACEBOOK
35 & 38
1436949 23 March
2006 23 March
2026 3. FACEBOOK
25 1535619
28 February
2007 28 February
2027 4. FACEBOOK
9, 38 & 42
1622925 20 Nov