HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NAVEEN BHADANA – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-1555/2022
Page 1 of 4
$~1
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
BAIL APPLN. 1555/2022, CRL.M.A.9890/2022
NAVEEN BHADANA
..... Petitioner
Through:
None.
versus
THE STATE ( NCT OF DELHI)
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Amit Ahlawat, Addl. PP
for State with Mr. Gagan
Kumar, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE POONAM A. BAMBA
POONAM A. BAMBA, J.:
1.0
The present application has been filed u/s 438 of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.PC) on behalf of the accused/applicant
for grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0170/2022 dated 08.04.2022
registered under u/Ss 186/332/353/354/354D/509/34 IPC, PS Timarpur,
Delhi.
2.0
It is submitted that the applicant been falsely implicated by the
complainant/prosecutrix in collusion with the police officials. It is stated
that actually, the complainant along with her family members is living in
their vicinity on rent. The applicant’s brother Praveen used to
accompany complainant’s landlord (who is close to the applicant’s
family), to the rented premises, which was not liked by the complainant
and her family members. To avenge and put pressure on the applicant
and his family members, the complainant leveled false allegations
against him.The applicant as well his brother and mother were at home
at the given time, which can be verified from the CCTV footage.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002725
Page 2 of 4
2.1
The applicant has also submitted that he is working as a driver and
is the sole bread earner of his family consisting of his wife and two
minor children aged about 12 years and 07 years, respectively. He is
presently unemployed after COVID-19 and his family is at the verge of
starvation.
2.2
It is further submitted that the applicant belongs to a respectable
family and has deep roots in society and there is no possibility of his
absconding.
2.3
It is also submitted that in his absence, some police officials
visited his residence and therefore, he apprehends arrest. He is ready to
join investigation as and when required. No purpose will be served by
keeping him behind the bars.
2.4
It is also submitted that the applicant’s mother has already been
granted anticipatory bail vide order dated 05.05.2022 by Ld. PO MACT-
02 (Central), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
3.0
This application is strongly opposed by Ld. Addl. PP. It is
submitted that there are serious allegations against the applicant not only
of assaulting, outraging modesty of the prosecutrix, but also of
assaulting police officials on duty. Investigation is still at initial stage
and therefore, this application is liable to be dismissed.
3.1
As per the status report, a PCR call was received vide DD No.
95A, PS Timar Pur, regarding molestation of a lady. On which, Ct.
Manish along with Ct. Amit reached the spot, where victim along with
her father Sh. Manoj Dutta were present and informed the police officers
that the applicant/accused Naveen and his brother Praveen abused her
and her father; and accused persons pulled her hand and touched at his
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002725
Page 3 of 4
private part.
3.2
It further mentions that when Ct. Manish and Ct. Amit made
enquiry from the accused persons, they were assaulted by both the
accused persons. Thereafter, the accused persons’ mother Smt. Krishana
Devi reached the spot and pushed Ct. Amit and hit him with a brick on
his right hand. Not only this, they took Ct. Manish and Ct. Amit inside
their house and kept them confined. Ct. Amit was medically examined at
Aruna Asaf Ali Hospital and was treated for the simple injuries suffered
by him. His MLC was prepared.
3.3
Ld. Addl. Prosecutor submitted that the complainant/prosecutrix
in her statement u/S. 164 Cr.PC has supported the prosecution case. She
has also stated that she is being pressurized by the family members of
the accused persons to take her case back. Ev