HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-20 – Appellant
Versus
KAVITA AGARWAL – Respondent
ITA-190/2022
ITA No 190/2022
Page 1 of 7
$~S-2
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
ITA 190/2022 & CM APPL.29957/2022
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX-20..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Ajit Sharma, Sr. Standing
Counsel.
versus
KAVITA AGARWAL
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Gautam Jain, Advocate with
Mr.Piyush Kumar Kamal, Advocate.
%
Date of Decision: 14thJuly, 2022
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
J U D G M E N T
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (Oral):
CM APPL.29957/2022 (condonation of delay)
For the averments made in the application, the delay of 177 days in
filing the present appeal is condoned.
Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
ITA 190/2022
1.
The present Income Tax appeal arises out of common impugned order
dated 6thOctober, 2020 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal
(hereinafter referred to as the ‘ITAT’) in ITA No. 6178/Del/2018 for
assessment year 2010-11.
2.
The facts giving rise to the present appeal are that the Investigation
Wing of the Income Tax Department carried out a search and seizure
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002760
ITA No 190/2022
Page 2 of 7
operation against M/s K.R. Pulp & Papers Limited under Section 132(1) of
the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to ‘the Act’) on 8thJuly,
2015 at various residential and business premises. The said company is
stated to be managed and controlled by Shri Madho Gopal Agarwal, Shri
Raj Gopal Agarwal and Shri Gopal Agarwal. The statement of Shri Gopal
Agarwal was recorded on 8thJuly, 2015 and the statement of Shri Madho
Gopal Agarwal was recorded during post search inquiry.
3.
Pursuant to the aforesaid search, notice under Section 153A of the Act
was issued on 26thSeptember, 2016 by the Assessing Officer and the same
was duly served upon the assessee. In response, the assessee filed her
Income Tax Return declaring income of Rs. 5,98,600/- on 2ndMarch, 2017.
The Assessing Officer after making reference to the documents discovered
during the raid, vide order dated 29thDecember, 2017 made the following
additions to the income of the assessee under Section 69B and Section 68 of
the Act respectively:
Total income computed by the assessing officer
Rs
Income as declared
5,89,600
Add: Forfeiture amount against property Vatika
40,00,000
Add: Investment in share
5,18,75,175
Total taxable Income
5,64,64,775
4.
Being aggrieved by the same, an appeal was filed by the assessee
before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) [hereinafter referred to
as ‘CIT(A)’]. Vide order dated 17thJuly, 2018, the CIT(A) allowed the
appeal of the assessee, deleted additions and held as under :-
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002760
ITA No 190/2022
Page 3 of 7
5.
The department preferred an appeal before the ITAT which was
dismissed vide an order dated 6thOctober, 2020.
6.
The
ITAT concluded that the additions made by the Assessing
Officer for the assessment year under consideration was not based on any
incriminating material found during the course of search on 8thJuly, 2015. It
held that the documents referred to by the Assessing Officer pertains to the
period w.e.f. 1stApril, 2010 to 31stMarch, 2011 which relate to the
assessment year 2011-12 and not for the impugned assessment year 2010-
11. The ITAT observed that the original return of income was filed by the
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002760
ITA No 190/2022
Page 4 of 7
assessee for the assessment year under appeal on 28thSeptember, 2011. The
search was conducted on 8thJuly, 2015 and on the date of the search, the
assessment under appeal was completed as the time period to issue notice
under Section 143(2) of the Act for the said year has expired. The ITAT
thus, observed that on the date of search i.e. on 8thJuly, 2015, assessment for
the assessment year 2010-11 had attained finality and was not pending
assessment. The ITAT, therefore, held that any additions o