HIGH COURT OF DELHI
M/S LEO CARGO SERVICES THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SH. SANJEEV MAGGU – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, AIRPORT AND GENERAL, NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, NEW DELHI – Respondent
CUSAA-8/2020
CUSAA 8/2020 Page 1 of 29
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Judgment reserved on: 23.05.2022
Judgment pronounced on: 28.07.2022
+
CUSAA 8/2020 & CM APPLs.34414/2020 & 13447/2021
M/S LEO CARGO SERVICES THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR
SH. SANJEEV MAGGU
..... Appellant
Through : Mr Akhil Krishan Maggu and
Mr Ashish Batra, Advs.
versus
COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS, AIRPORT AND GENERAL,
NEW CUSTOM HOUSE, NEW DELHI
..... Respondent
Through : Mr Harpreet Singh, Sr Standing
Counsel with Ms Suhani Mathur
and Mr Jatin Kumar Gaur, Advs.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR JUSTICE RAJIV SHAKDHER
HON'BLE MS JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU
[Physical Court Hearing/ Hybrid Hearing (as per request)]
JUDGMENT
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.:
CM APPL. 13447/2021 [for placing additional document on record] & CM
APPL. 34414/2020 [for placing on record judgment in the context of the
appeal filed on 21.12.2020]
1. No objection to this application has been made by the Respondent and
in any event these are relevant citations in the matter. Hence, these
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002894
CUSAA 8/2020 Page 2 of 29
applications are allowed.
CUSAA 8/2020
2. The present appeal has been filed against the order dated 01.10.2019
passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal
(hereinafter referred to as the „CESTAT‟).
3. By an order dated 29.03.2022, this Court framed the following
questions of law: -
licence was revoked?”
4. We were informed by the counsel for the Appellant on 23.05.2022 that
the Appellant does not wish to press the second question of law framed
above. Therefore, this judgment is confined to only the following
question: -
Brokers Licensing Regulations, 2013 is directory?”
5. The brief facts relevant for the purpose of this judgment are as follows:-
5.1
Information was received by the Office of Commissioner of Customs
(Airport and General)/Respondent herein from Additional Director,
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002894
CUSAA 8/2020 Page 3 of 29
DRI, HQ, New Delhi which stated that one Sh. Sanjeev Maggu,
Director of the Appellant Company/Appellant herein, along with one
other person (Sh. Ramesh Wadhera) were engaged in evasion of
Customs Duty by way of diverting the goods stored in Custom Bonded
warehouses, into domestic market, without payment of customs duty
and, further, that documents to show re-export of warehoused goods
were also being forged/fabricated by the said persons. It was averred
that for the purpose of evasion, allegedly fictitious firms were created
by the Appellant and one Shri Ramesh Wadhera, and Import Export
Codes (IEC‟s) were obtained in the name of:-
(i)
M/s Accturists (OPC) Pvt. Ltd (IEC: 0517503581);
(ii)
M/s Sparx Exports (IEC: 0516517803);
(iii)
M/s Shree Shyam Enterprises (IEC: 0516966839); and
(iv)
M/s Horrens Exim (IEC: 0516516299).
5.2
The information further added that the Appellant and Shri Ramesh
Wadhera had also obtained bonded warehouse(s) in the names of their
employees with fictitious residential addresses, which were used for
diversion of warehoused goods into the domestic market without
payment of customs duty. It was further averred that the aforesaid
persons were utilizing the services of other customs brokers for the
clandestine removal of goods. It was also alleged that the Appellant was
the mastermind and Sh. Ramesh Wadhera was the financier behind the
aforesaid illegal activities.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002894
CUSAA 8/2020
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.