SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
HARDEEP KAPOOR – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH VERMA – Respondent


RFA 33/2020 Page 1 of 13

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Date of Decision:- 01.08.2022

+

RFA 33/2020 & CM APPL. 1898/2020 -Stay., CM APPL.

17227/2020 -E-hearing/Vac. of Stay/Stay by Res., CM APPL.

10080/2022 -E-hearing/Dir. by Res.

HARDEEP KAPOOR

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr.Amar Nath Saini, Adv.

versus

RAJESH VERMA

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr.Rohit K Modi, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI

REKHA PALLI, J (ORAL)

1.

The regular first appeal under Section 96, Code of Civil Procedure

seeks to assail the judgment and decree dated 30.11.2019 passed by the

learned Additional District Judge, Rohini Courts, New Delhi in

C.S.No.420/2017. Vide the impugned judgment, the respondent/plaintiff’s

suit for possession of the property being, LIG Flat No.QU-4B, First Floor,

Pitampura Delhi-110034, arrears of rent w.e.f., 01.01.2016 along with

interest @7%, has been decreed by the Ld. Trial Court.

2.

The common case of the parties is that the suit property was let out by

the respondent in favour of the appellant. While it is the respondent’s case

that the appellant

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top