HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PARVEEN – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
BAIL APPLN.-627/2022
$~49
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
BAIL APPLN. 627/2022
PARVEEN
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sunil Tiwari, Adv.
versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. N.S. Bajwa, APP for State.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE TALWANT SINGH
Talwant Singh, J.:
1. This is a first regular bail application of petitioner Parveen in case FIR
No. 197/2020 under Sections 21/29/61/85 NDPS Act of PS Crime Branch.
1.1
She is stated to be in JC since 17.12.2020. It has been further
submitted that FIR was registered on the complaint of complainant namely
SI Arvind Kumar, police station Narcotic Cell/Crime Branch on receipt of
secret information from the secret informer on 17.12.2020 at about 4.00 p.m.
that one person namely Pappu, who is living at Old Delhi Railway Station,
who used to supply the smack in bulk quantity in Delhi and NCR, would
supply the smack in large quantity at Rama Road, Moti Nagar, Delhi at
about 6.00 or 6.30 p.m.. This information was conveyed to SHO Manohar
Singh at 4.15 p.m., and it was further conveyed to the ACP/Narcotics Cell
Sanjeev Kumar at 4.30 p.m. on which ACP/Narcotic had directed to conduct
the raid. A raid party was formed, which left for the spot along with the
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002998
secret informer. Raiding party reached at the spot at 6.30 p.m. 4-5 persons
were asked to join the investigation but they refused to join. One person
was found coming from the side of Pahwa Hyundai Motor Road and he
stood on the footpath opposite to the transformer and he was waiting for
someone there. After 4-5 minutes one lady from the railway line side, who
was carrying a black colour polythene in her right hand, stopped near the
person who was standing near the transformer.
1.2
After talking to each other for some time, the said Pappu gave one
polythene packet to the said lady and the lady handed over a black colour
polythene
to
him
and
when
both
were
leaving,
they
were
apprehended/overpowered by the members of the raiding party. Again 4-5
persons were asked to join the proceedings but they refused to do so. The
name of the apprehended person was revealed as Gulbabu @ Pappu and the
name of the lady was revaled as Parveen.
1.3
ACP Narcotic Cell was briefed. IO briefed Gulbabu @ Pappu about
his legal rights to be searched before any gazetted officer/Magistrate.
Notice under Section 50 of NDPS Act was prepared in this regard. Gulbabu
@ Pappu refused to call any Magistrate and Gazetted Officer on the spot.
Similarly, Parveen was informed about her legal rights and notice under
Section 50 NDPS was prepared and she refused to call any Magistrate or
Gazetted Officer at the spot. ACP arrived at the spot at about 9.30 p.m. and
he made enquiries from both the persons and after satisfying himself, he
directed the IO to carry out the search of both the persons in his presence. A
lady constable conducted the search of the present applicant and there was
recovery of transparent polythene from the right hand of the present
applicant, in which powder of brown colour was kept.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/002998
1.4
On testing the same, it was found to be heroin and the weight of the
same was found to be of 150 gms. Similarly, search of Gulbabu @ Pappu
was conducted and a polythene was recovered from his hand in which there
were four bundles of Rs. 500/- denomination notes and one bundle of Rs.
100/- denomination notes, the total currency recovered comes to Rs.
2,20,000/- and the same was seized.
1.5
On the basis of the above, the present FIR was registered; charge-
sheet was filed in Court; the interim bail moved by the petitioner was
allowed on the ground that the daughter of the present petitioner was
pregnant and there was nobody to look after her; the accused surrendered
after the expiry of the interim bail and then moved