HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAJIV KHOSLA – Appellant
Versus
DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-8197/2022
W.P.(C) 8197/2022 & connected matters Page 1 of 19
$~58 to 60
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 12th September, 2022.
+
W.P.(C) 8197/2022 & CM APPL. 34021/2022
RAJIV KHOSLA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Sunil Singh and Ms. Anuwesha
Borah, Advocates with Petitioner in
person.
versus
DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS.
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Mohit Mathur and
Mr. Sudhdanshu Batra, Senior
Advocates with Mr. Nikhil Mehta and
Mr. Devashu Chauhan, Advocates for
R-1.
+
W.P.(C) 13027/2022, CM APPLs. 39465-39466/2022, 39915-
39916/2022 & 40005-40006/2022
S C MALHOTRA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Mr. Sunil Singh
and Ms. Anuwesha Borah, Advocates.
versus
DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION AND ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Mohit Mathur and
Mr. Sudhdanshu Batra, Senior
Advocates with Mr. Nikhil Mehta and
Mr. Devashu Chauhan, Advocates for
R-1.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003640
W.P.(C) 8197/2022 & connected matters Page 2 of 19
+
W.P.(C) 13030/2022 & CM APPL. 39473-39474/2022
ASHUTOSH KUMAR SINGH
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Rakesh Tiku, Senior Advocate
with Mr. Rajiv Khosla, Mr. Sunil
Singh and Ms. Anuwesha Borah,
Advocates.
versus
DELHI HIGH COURT BAR ASSOCIATION & ORS.
.... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Mohit Mathur and
Mr. Sudhdanshu Batra, Senior
Advocates with Mr. Nikhil Mehta and
Mr. Devashu Chauhan, Advocates for
R-1.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
JUDGMENT
SANJEEV NARULA, J. (Oral):
1. In the backdrop of forthcoming elections for the Executive Committee
of the Delhi High Court Bar Association [“DHCBA”] scheduled for 29th
September 2022, Petitioners in W.P. (C) No. 13027/2022 (Mr. S.C.
Malhotra) and W.P. (C) No. 13030/2022 (Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Singh), who
are members of the DHCBA, are aggrieved with deletion of their names
from the list of eligible voters. They seek time to pay their outstanding dues
in terms of rules/ resolutions/ guidelines/ constitution of the DHCBA, and to
be included in the electoral roll. Petitioner in W.P. (C) No. 8197/ 2022 (Mr.
Rajiv Khosla) is seeking implementation and strict compliance of the
judgment dated 31st May, 2016 and order dated 18th October, 2016, both in
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003640
W.P.(C) 8197/2022 & connected matters Page 3 of 19
W.P.(C) 8106/2010 titled P. K. Dash, Advocate & Ors. v. Bar Council of
Delhi & Ors., as well as of the extant rules and regulations of DHCBA, in
light of which, he seeks directions to DHCBA to: (i) follow the mode of
payment of subscription for voting rights; (ii) constitute Election
Commission as per the directions in P. K. Dash(supra); and (iii) conduct
elections in a timely manner.
2. Counsels for DHCBA and the Election Commission have handed over
some documents containing the election schedule, resolutions and notices of
DHCBA, and brief submissions – all of which are taken on record.
Considering the common grounds urged, afore-noted documents shall be
treated as part of the record in each of the cases.
FACTS
3. The factual background of the present dispute is as follows:
3.1.
On 06thAugust 2022, a list titled: ‘Consolidated Provisional
Election, 2022’ was notified by the Election Committee of DHCBA
[hereinafter, “Provisional List”]. List-A annexed thereto contained
tabulated particulars of 9173 members with a ‘yes’/ ‘no’ against their
name in the last column titled ‘Whether provisionally entitled to vote’.
Mr. Ashutosh Kumar Singh was at serial number 7173 and Mr. S.C.
Malhotra was at serial number 4111, with a ‘yes’ against their names.
3.2.
As per resolution of the DHCBA dated 09th August 2