SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJ KUMAR GUPTA & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
JAGAN NATH BAJAJ & ORS. – Respondent


CS(COMM) 374/2020 Page 1 of 8

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of Decision : 19th September, 2022

+

CS(COMM) 374/2020

RAJ KUMAR GUPTA & ANR.

..... Plaintiffs

Through:

Mr. N. Prabhakar with Mr. Dhruv

Sharma and Mr. Uday Sharma,

Advocates.

versus

JAGAN NATH BAJAJ & ORS.

..... Defendants

Through:

Mr. S.S. Tripathy and Mr. Gagan

Singh Bagga, Advocate for D-1.

Mr. Nitesh Kumar, Advocate for D-4.

Mr. Lovenish Mendiratta, Advocate.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL

AMIT BANSAL, J. (ORAL)

I.A. 3221/2022(for condonation of delay in re-filing I.A.3220/2022

1.

For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed and

delay in re-filing I.A. No.3220/2022 is condoned.

2.

The application stands disposed of.

I.A. 6249/2022(O-VI R-17 of CPC) & I.A. 6250/2022(O-VII R-14(3) of

CPC)

3.

By way of I.A. No.6249/2022, the plaintiffs seek to amend the plaint

and by way of I.A. No.6250/2022, the plaintiffs seek to file additional

documents.

4.

Notice in these applications was issued

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top