BAIL APPLN. 1987/2022 JASPAL SINGH ANAND V GNCT OF DELHI

1/6

$~33

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: September 02, 2022

Decided on: September 19, 2022

+

BAIL APPLN. 1987/2022

JASPAL SINGH ANAND

..... Applicant

Through: Mr. H S Phoolka, Sr.

Advocate with Mr. Mohit

Gupta, Ms. Sharanya Sinha

and Ms. Shilpa Diwan,

Advocates.

versus

GNCT OF DELHI

..... Respondent

Through: Mr.

Shashank

Khurana,

Mr. Shiv Mangal Sharma,

Mr. Daksh Sachdeva,

Advocates with S.I. Amit

Kumar, EOW-VII.

%

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN

JUDGMENT

1.

The present application is filed under section 439 Cr.P.C read

with section 482 Cr.P.C for grant of regular bail on behalf of the

applicant Jaspal Singh Anand under section in FIR bearing no.

0096/2018 under section 406/420/34 IPC registered at P.S. Economic

Offences Wing and the applicant is stated to be in judicial custody

since 31.05.2018.

2.

The perusal of FIR bearing no. 0096/2018 reflects that it was

got registered on the basis of complaint made by Maninder Singh s/o

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003766

BAIL APPLN. 1987/2022 JASPAL SINGH ANAND V GNCT OF DELHI

2/6

Surinder Singh wherein it was stated that the applicant and his wife

namely Raminder Kaur @ Simmi are running a boutique at C-1/122,

First Floor, Janakpuri, New Delhi under the name and style of

Dulhan Boutique and are known to the complainant and his relatives.

The applicant and his wife Raminder Kaur @ Simmi approached the

complainant for taking a friendly loan with assurance to return the

same back as early as possible. The complainant gave Rs. 30 lakhs

(Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) as friendly loan through cheques drawn

on Karur Vysya Bank, Janakpuri but the applicant and his wife did

not return back the said amount, despite various requests made by the

complainant. The complainant subsequently came to know that the

applicant and his wife are the habitual cheaters and they have taken

loan from several other persons and did not return back the loan

amount. The applicant and his wife is stated to have sold their shop

and houses and thereafter, transferred the money to other country and

also were trying to flee from the country but were arrested.

3.

It is stated in the application under consideration, that the

complainant’s have looted the boutique of the applicant and his wife

for which FIR bearing no. 0096/2018 was got registered. The

complainants were having financial transactions with the applicant

and his wife. The complainant owes Rs. 5,30,000/-(Rupees Five Lakh

Thirty Thousand Only) to the applicant and his wife. The

complainant did not have any dishonest intention or induced the

complainant at any point of time. In the application, the details of the

transaction with the other complainants who were surfaced during

investigation have been narrated. The Bail application was rejected

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003766

BAIL APPLN. 1987/2022 JASPAL SINGH ANAND V GNCT OF DELHI

3/6

vide order dated 09.06.2022 passed by the Court of Shri Aashish

Gupta, Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, South West

District, Dwarka. It is prayed that the accused applicant be released

on bail.

4.

The respondent/State filed the Status Report wherein it was

stated that the present FIR was got registered on the basis of

complaint made by Maninder Singh who advanced friendly loan of

Rs. 30 Lakhs (Rupees Thirty Lakhs Only) through different cheques

to the applicant and his wife Raminder Kaur @ Simmi. During

investigation, other persons namely Dayawati, Laxmi Seth,

Aakanksha Khanna, Pushpinder Singh, Taranjit Singh etc., were

surfaced as victims who have given about Rs. 2.5 Crores to the

applicant and his wife Raminder Kaur @ Simmi on false assurance to

retu