HIGH COURT OF DELHI
BUDHU (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS – Appellant
Versus
NATHU (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS AND ORS – Respondent
W.P.(C)-3670/2017
W.P.(C) 3670/2017
Page 1 of 22
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of order: 22nd September, 2022
+
W.P.(C) 3670/2017 & CM APPL. 16145/2017 & CM APPL.
40425/2017
BUDHU (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS
..... Petitioners
Through:
Mr. R. B. Singh and Mr. Mohd
Hashim, Advocates
versus
NATHU (NOW DECEASED) THR LRS AND ORS
.....Respondents
Through:
Mr. Parvez Bashista, Advocate for
R-10, 11, 13 and 14
Mr. Sameer Vashisht, ASC, Civil,
GNCTD with Ms. Sanjana Nangia,
Advocate for R-15 (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)
1. The instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of
India has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking the following
reliefs:
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003903
W.P.(C) 3670/2017
Page 2 of 22
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003903
W.P.(C) 3670/2017
Page 3 of 22
the interest of justice, equity and fair trial.”
FACTUAL MATRIX
2. The facts of the case necessary for deciding the instant writ petition
are as follows:-
Sh. Budhu-predecessor-in-interest of the Petitioners herein, has been in
continuous use and possession of the agricultural land in Khasra No.
18(14-8) alongwith Khasra No. 38min (5-17), 74min (5-5), 83min (4-l)
admeasuring 29 Bigha 11 Biswa situated in the revenue estate of Village
Nangli, Rajapur, New Delhi, since the year 1947-48 as a tenant by its
original recorded owner Smt. Hardevi on batainisfi.
3. On 11th June 1958 Sh. Nathu (now Deceased) was declared
Bhumidar of the subject land and Sh. Budhu (now deceased) being in
unauthorized/illegal possession of the subject land. The Bhumidhari
rights issued in favour of Nathu was initially challenged by the legal
representatives of Shri Budhu by filing of a Civil Suit against Nathu, the
predecessor in-interest of Respondents. The said Civil Suit was dismissed
on merits vide order dated 7th May 1962 by the then Sub-Judge, Delhi.
The said order was appealed by the legal representatives’ of Budhu vide a
Regular Civil Appeal No.126/62. The said Appeal was also dismissed on
merits by the Court of Additional District Judge vide order dated 8th
November 1962. Thereafter, the said order was never challenged by the
legal representatives of Budhu.
4. Sh. Nathu, the predecessor-in-interest of the Respondents, filed a
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/003903
W.P.(C) 3670/2017
Page 4 of 22
suit for ejectment under Section 84 of Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 in
respect of Khasra No. 18 (14-8) seeking inter-alia decree of ejectment of
Sh. Budhu s/o Sh. Sher Singh alleging that Budhu to be in occupation of
the land in question in Kharif 1957 without his consent, as he has been
declared as the Bhumidar in respect of the said land.
5. On 21st January 1963 Suit under Section 84 of Delhi Land Reforms
Act, 1954 filed by Nathu against Budhu, was dismissed by the Ld.
Revenue Assistant on the ground that Nathu has no locus standi to file the
suit. Nathu filed an appeal before the learned Additional Collector, which
was allowed in favour of Nathu vide order dated 10th January 1964. The
legal heirs of Budhu filed a revision petition bearing no.131/1964 under
section 187 of Delhi Land Reforms Act, 1954 before the learned Chief
Commissioner against the order dated 10th January 1964 passed by the
Additional Collector. The said revision petition was allowed vide order
dated 17th September 1965 and the order of the Additional Collector was
set aside and that of the Revenue Assistant restored.
6. On 26th April 1973 the legal heirs of Sh. Nathu filed Civil Writ
Petition No.l-D/1966 against the order dated 17th September 1965 of the
learned Chief Commissioner, allowing the revision petition. The civil
writ petition was allowed by a Co-ordinate