DELHI HIGH COURT
CONSULTING ENGINEERS GROUP LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF INDIA (NHAI) – Respondent
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.)-244/2022
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 244/2022 Page 1 of 24
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 244/2022 & I.A. 12741/2022
CONSULTING ENGINEERS GROUP LIMITED..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.
Arvind
Nayar,
Sr.
Advocate with Ms. Nandadevi
Deka, Mr. Sudhir Yadav, Mr.
Savyasachi Rawat and Mr.
Akshay
Joshi,
Advocates
(M:8130788166)
versus
NATIONAL HIGHWAYS AUTHORITY OF
INDIA (NHAI)
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms.
Gunjan
Sinha
Jain,
Advocate
(M:9811387311;email:gunjan.si
nha@surico.in)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
JUDGMENT
%
06.10.2022
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
1. By way of the present petition under Section 9 of the
Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter called “The Act”),
petitioner is seeking prayer for staying operation of debarment order
dated 02.08.2022 issued by the respondent by which petitioner has
been debarred from participating in all the tenders floated by
respondent and other executing agencies of Ministry of Road
Transport and Highways of India, for a period of three months with
levy of penalty of Rs. 20 lakhs. The petitioner further prays for
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004041
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 244/2022 Page 2 of 24
restraining respondent from giving effect to or acting in terms of or in
furtherance of the said debarment order, and for restraining respondent
from rejecting the bills submitted by petitioner prior to the order dated
02.08.2022 as non responsive.
2. Facts in brief are that, notice inviting tender dated 15.03.2018
was issued by respondent for the project: consultancy services for
Authority‟s Engineer (hereinafter referred to as „AE‟) for supervision
of construction of 8 Lane Dwarka Expressway from Delhi-Haryana
Border to start of rail over bridge, Gurugram, Haryana. As per the
tender document, bidders could apply either as a sole firm or by
forming joint venture with other consultants.
3. In order to participate in the aforesaid tender process and to
provide consultancy services, M/s Aecom Asia Company Ltd
(hereinafter referred as “M/s Aecom”) and M/s Consulting
Engineering Group Ltd. (hereinafter referred as „petitioner‟) agreed to
form a consortium wherein M/s Aecom was the lead partner and
petitioner was the associate partner. Memorandum of Understanding
(MOU) dated 14.05.2018 was entered between petitioner and M/s
Aecom for this purpose. Petitioner entered into the bidding process as
joint venture with M/s Aecom pursuant to the aforesaid MOU.
Technical and financial bids were submitted by M/s Aecom for
participation in the tender process.
4. Subsequently, Letter of Award (“LOA”) dated 22.10.2018 was
issued to the consortium of petitioner and M/s Aecom. LOA was
specifically addressed to M/s Aecom being the lead partner and
authorized representative of the consultants.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004041
O.M.P.(I) (COMM.) 244/2022 Page 3 of 24
5. Consultancy Agreement dated 05.12.2018 was entered between
the consortium of petitioner and M/s Aecom as joint venture on the
one hand and respondent on the other hand. Clause 8 of the said
Consultancy Agreement under the General Conditions of Contract
provides for amicable settlement of disputes between the parties, as
follows:
'' 8.Settlement of Disputes
8.1Amicable Settlement
8.2Dispute Settlement
6. The contract for construction of 8 lane Dwarka Expressway was
awarded to Larsen and Toubro Ltd. (hereinafter referred as EPC
Contractor). The consortium of petitioner and M/s Aecom was
engaged as consultant to act on behalf of respondent herein as
Authority‟s Engineer for supervision of the said construction work.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.