HIGH COURT OF DELHI
VINITA GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
AMIT ARORA – Respondent
CS(COMM)-395/2022
CS(COMM) 395/2022 Page 1 of 39
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
+
CS(COMM) 395/2022
VINITA GUPTA
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. N. Mahabir, Mr. Abhishek Saini
and Mr. P.C. Arya, Advocates.
versus
AMIT ARORA
..... Defendant
Through:
Mr. Umesh Mishra, Mr. Junaid Alam
and Mr. Nishant Mahtta, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
JUDGEMENT
JYOTI SINGH, J.
I.A. 9130/2022 (under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC, by Plaintiff)
1.
This judgment shall dispose of an application preferred on behalf of
the Plaintiff under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.
2.
Present suit has been filed for injunction by the Plaintiff restraining
the Defendant and others acting on his behalf from selling, offering for sale,
advertising or promoting any product under the trademark ‘APPLEPLANT’
or any trademark similar to Plaintiff’s trademark ‘APPLESTREE’, which
may cause confusion and deception in the market, leading to passing off
Defendant’s goods as those of the Plaintiff, including products in similar
packaging, get-up, trade dress as well as infringement of copyright in the
artistic work comprised in Plaintiff’s label, amongst other reliefs.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004060
CS(COMM) 395/2022 Page 2 of 39
3.
Expose of facts set out in the plaint and succinctly put are that the
registered trademark APPLESTREE as well as packaging/trade dress has
been used by the proprietor of Palm Abrasives, Late Shri Yogesh Gupta
from the year 2008. Late Shri Gupta expired on 14.05.2021 due to
COVID-19 Pandemic and thereafter, Plaintiff has taken over the said Firm.
Trademark APPLESTREE is well-known and under the said trademark,
huge sales were generated in India for various products such as Abrasive
Strips, Abrasive Rolls, Abrasive Paste etc. as well as Silicon Carbide
Waterproof Abrasive Paper, Velcro Disc, Sandpaper and other allied and
cognate goods.
4.
It is averred that trademark APPLESTREE was coined by the
predecessor/husband of the Plaintiff in the year 2008. Invoices placed on
record show that until 2021, no other brand was used for sale of the products
and it was only in the year 2021 that Plaintiff commenced use of another
brand i.e. ‘AXE products of APPLESTREE’.
5.
It is stated that by virtue of long, continuous and extensive use of the
trademark APPLESTREE for over 14 years with its distinctive packaging,
the trademark has acquired a secondary meaning and has become highly
distinctive such that it is associated with the Plaintiff and none else. By
virtue of prior adoption, prior use coupled with extensive publicity and
promotion, Plaintiff has acquired common law rights apart from proprietary
interest in the trademark APPLESTREE and its packaging, get-up and trade
dress. Plaintiff also claims copyright in the artistic work in the packaging,
which was created/authored by her husband in January, 2008 and was
commercially published in the said year. Plaintiff is thus entitled to
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004060
CS(COMM) 395/2022 Page 3 of 39
protection under the Copyright Act, 1957 and any unauthorized use would
be deemed to be infringement under Section 51 of the said Act.
6.
Plaintiff
has averred that trademark
APPLESTREE enjoys
registrations in Classes 03, 08, 07 and 17 and registrations are valid and
subsisting. Annual sales figures of Plaintiff’s products under the trademark
APPLESTREE with its distinctive packaging show steady growth from the
year 2008-09 and in 2021-22, the annual turnover is Rs. 12,57,33,557/-.
Substantial sums of money are