HIGH COURT OF DELHI
L OREAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-12557/2022
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
W.P.(C) 12557/2022
L OREAL INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr.Mukul Rohatgi, Sr.Advocate with
Mr.V.Lakshmikumaran, Mr.Karan
Sachdev and Mr.Agrim Arora,
Advocates.
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Ms.Uma Prasuna Bachu, Advocate
for R-1.
Mr.Zoheb Hossain, Sr.Standing
Counsel for the Revenue with
Mr.Vivek Gurnani and Ms.Niharika
Kuchhal, Advocates for R-2, 3 &
4/NAA and DGAP.
%
Reserved On
: 02ndSeptember, 2022
Date of Decision: 06thOctober, 2022
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANMOHAN
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
J U D G M E N T
MANMOHAN, J:
CM APPL.38028/2022
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Accordingly, the present application stands disposed of.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004085
CM APPL.38027/2022
1.
Accompanying writ petition has been filed challenging the order
dated 23rdJune, 2022 passed by the Respondent No.2 in order No. 26/2022
and
the notice dated 1stJune, 2022. Petitioner also seeks to challenge
Section 171 of the CGST Act, Chapter XV of the CGST Rules, more
particularly, Rules 126, 127 & 133 of the CGST Rules as unconstitutional,
ultra vires and violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 265 & 300A of the
Constitution of India.
2.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submitted that the National
Anti-Profiteering Authority (NAA) has no suo moto powers and therefore,
the application filed by the Secretary, NAA, to the Standing Committee
seeking initiation of proceedings under Section 171, is not a valid initiation
of proceedings against the petitioner for examining whether there is any
profiteering or not.
3.
He contended that NAA is not netting of the benefit of rate reduction
extended in some products as against those where the petitioner has not
extended the benefit of rate reduction qua the subject products, by way of
commensurate reduction in prices, and therefore, while it is being punished
for being a ‘bad boy’, it is not being rewarded for being a ‘good boy’.
4.
He stated that even though in some products they have not been able
to grant commensurate reduction in prices, yet they have tried to pass on the
benefit by way of increase in grammage of the product.
5.
He also stated that petitioner has given post sale discount (Ex.GST) to
the tune of Rs.73.59 crores, and therefore, this amount should be reduced
from the total profiteered sum.
This is a digitally signed Judgement.
NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004085
6.
Learned senior counsel for the petitioner further contended that
increase of customs duty on certain products should be excluded. In support
of this argument, he gave certain illustrations from which it could be seen
that when compared the invoices issued during the period 15thNovember,
2017 to 30thNovember, 2017 with the invoice raised in the month of March
2018, the actual sale price per unit including GST had remained same during
both periods. He also prayed that the profiteering on account of GST
collected by him, should be excluded.
7.
Per contra, learned counsel for NAA contended that Section 171 of
GST confers powers of wide amplitude upon the NAA to examine “any
supply of goods or services” by any registered person and to examine
whether the reduction in the tax rate or benefit of input tax credits have been
passed on to the recipient by way of commensurate reduction in prices or
not. He stated that even assuming that the rules provide for a mechanism by
which a recipient or any other interested party or a Commissioner, can make
a written application in a prescribed form which is required to be examined
by the Standing Committee and the Screening Committee, however, this
procedure in no way fetters the original power conferred upon the NAA by
Section 171, to examine whether input tax credits availed by any registered
person or the reduction in the rate of tax on any supply of goods or services,
have been passed on to the recipient by way of comme