SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VIJAY MALHAN – Appellant
Versus
UOI & ORS. – Respondent


W.P. (C) 2903/2003

Page 1 of 60

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Reserved on :

25th July, 2022

Pronounced on: 13th October , 2022

+

W.P.(C) 2903/2003

VIJAY MALHAN

..... Petitioner

Through:

Ms. Srishti Agnihotri and Ms.

Sanjana Grace Thomas, Advocates

versus

UOI & ORS

..... Respondents

Through:

Ms.

Saroj

Bidawat,

Senior

Standing Counsel with Ms. Priti

and Ms. Anupriya, Advocates

Ms. Kittu Bajaj, Advocate for

OBC

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

J U D G M E N T

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

1. The instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India has been filed by the Petitioner who was earlier posted as the

Assistant General Manager, Regional Inspectorate at Chandigarh,

challenging the order dated 23rd January 2003 directing the removal of

Petitioner from services of Oriental Bank of Commerce (hereinafter

referred to as “Respondent Bank”) passed by the Disciplinary Authority

and upheld by the Appellate Authority vide order dated 28th February

2003.

This is a digitally signed Judgement.

NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004231

W.P. (C) 2903/2003

Page 2 of 60

FACTUAL MATRIX

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top