SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AKASH ARYA – Appellant
Versus
PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS – Respondent


$~5

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

+

LPA 256/2019

AKASH ARYA

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Shanker Raju and Mr. Nilansh

Gaur, Advs.

versus

PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK & ORS

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Rajat Arora, Adv.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAJMI WAZIRI

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

JUDGMENT

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J.

1.

The appellant being dissatisfied with the judgment of the learned

Single Judge dated 12.03.2019 in W.P.(C) 2908/2016, has preferred the

present intra-court appeal.

2.

The facts relevant for deciding the present appeal as culled out from

the record are that the appellant joined the respondent no.1-bank as a

Management Trainee on 26.02.1990 and rose to the position of Manager.

While, he was posted as Manager, PNB Branch Office, Civil Lines, Aligarh,

a charge-sheet bearing no. CO:BSR:DAC:AA was issued to him by the

Disciplinary Authority under the Regulation 6 of PNB Officer Employees

(Discipline and Appeal) Regulations, 1977 („PNB Regulations, 1977‟), for

allegedly having committed lapses/irregularities during his posting as

Manager, PNB Branch Office, Kasana, District Gautam Budh Nagar. The

This is a digit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top