SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
UMAR KHALID – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI – Respondent


NEUTRAL CITATION NO: 2022/DHC/004325

CRL.A. 173/2022 Page 1 of 52

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on : 09.09.2022

% Pronounced on : 18.10.2022

+

CRL.A. 173/2022

UMAR KHALID

…..Appellant

Through : Mr. Trideep Pais, Senior Advocate

with Ms. Sanya Kumar, Mr. Sahil

Ghai and Ms. Rakshanda Deka,

Advocates.

versus

STATE OF NATIONAL CAPITAL TERRITORY OF DELHI

..... Respondent

Through : Mr. Amit Prasad, SPP for State

along with Mr. Ayodhya Prasad,

Advocate with Inspector Anil

Kumar and Inspector Lokesh

Sharma, P.S.: Special Cell, Lodhi

Colony.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SIDDHARTH MRIDUL

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJNISH BHATNAGAR

JUDGMENT

RAJNISH BHATNAGAR, J.

1.

The Appellant has preferred the present Appeal under Section 21(4)

of the National Investigation Agency Act, 2008 r/w Section 43-D(5) of the

Unlawful Activities Prevention Act, 196

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top