HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AMIT VATS AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
AJAY JAIN – Respondent
CM(M)-775/2022
Neutral Citation Number : 2022/DHC/004331
CM(M) 775/2022
Page 1 of 10
$~11(Appellate)
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
+
CM(M) 775/2022 & CM APPL.34338/2022
AMIT VATS AND ANR
..... Petitioners
Through:
Mr.Mukesh Anand, Adv.
versus
AJAY JAIN
..... Respondent
Through:
Mr.Amreek Singh, Adv.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C.HARI SHANKAR
J U D G M E N T (O R A L)
%
17.10.2022
1.
This petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,
assails order dated 26th July 2022, passed by the learned Additional
Senior Civil Judge (“the learned ASCJ”) in CS 1228/21 (Ajay Jain v.
Amit Vats), by which the learned ASCJ has rejected the application of
the petitioner, as the defendant in the said suit, under Order VII Rule
11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), seeking dismissal of
the suit instituted by the respondent against the petitioners.
The plaint
2.
Inasmuch as the impugned order has been passed on an
application filed by the petitioners under Order VII Rule 11 of the
CPC, it is necessary to briefly note the case set up by the respondent,
as the plaintiff in the plaint.
Digitally Signed
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:18.10.2022
15:30:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number : 2022/DHC/004331
CM(M) 775/2022
Page 2 of 10
3.
The suit deals with a property situated at A-31, Yojana Vihar,
Delhi, particularly the upper ground floor, first floor and terrace (the
suit property) thereof. I may note, even at this juncture, that there is,
in the pliant, some degree of contradiction, inasmuch as, in para 2 of
the plaint, it is averred that the suit premises were purchased by the
wife of the respondent, whereas, in paras 4 and 5, the respondent
claims to have purchased the suit premises himself.
4.
As against this, as per the averments in the plaint, Petitioner 1 is
the owner and Petitioner 2 and his family members are the occupiers
of the second and third floor of the property at A-31, Yajana Vihar,
Delhi.
5.
Paras 2, 4, 5 to 10 and 14 of the plaint, which set out the basis
for the rights asserted by the petitioners, may be reproduced thus:
“2.
That wife of the plaintiff namely Akansha Jain is the
owner and plaintiff and his family members are the occupier
of Upper Ground Floor and First Floor alongwith the terrace
floor of building no.A31, Yojna Vihar, Delhi. The Wife of the
plaintiff has purchased the said portion vide registered sale
deed No.7105 in book no.l, Vol No.2005 on page no.64 to 73
on dated 13-9-2019 and thumb impressions have taken in the
presence of Sub Registrar IV b Vivek Vihar Delhi from the
erstwhile owners i.e. Sh. Lokesh Tayal. The building was
constructed by the builder comprising of the Stilt, Upper
ground floor, First floor, Second floor, Third floor and terrace.
It is mentioned in the sale deed that “Whereas the vendor is
the absolute owner and in possession of 50% share of entire
built up freehold residential property bearing No.A-31(Plot
No.31, Block-A), Land Area Measuring 222.10 Sq.Mrs.
Having its plinth/covered area measuring 832.85 Sq. Mtrs
(Approx.) Alongwith its whole of the structure according to
the site thereon, consisting of stilt plus four storey thereon,
with roof/terrace rights, with the rights to further/upper storey
construction upto the last storey, fitted with electricity and
Digitally Signed
By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI
Signing Date:18.10.2022
15:30:50
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number : 2022/DHC/004331
CM(M) 775/2022
Page 3 of 10
water connection in running condition, situated in the layout
plan of planning commission cooperative house building
society ltd. presently colony known as "Yojna Vihar", Delhi-
110092.”
*****
4. That the Upper Ground and First floor and the terrace
rights’ have been purchased by the Plaintiff alongwith the
common areas and facilities like the right to use all entrances,
common lift facility, passages, staircases upto terrace, their
own serva