SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
DR. TAJINDER BHATTI – Respondent


Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/004573

CS(COMM) 430/2022 Page 1 of 12

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

CS(COMM) 430/2022 & I.A. 9660/2022, 13229/2022

SILVERMAPLE HEALTHCARE

SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED

..... Plaintiff

Through:

Mr. Tushar Singh, Ms. Sugandh

Virmani and Mr. Aditya Kumar, Advocates.

versus

DR. TAJINDER BHATTI

..... Defendant

Through:

Ms. Sneha Jain, Mr. Sidharth

Chopra, Mr. Vivek Ayyagari, Mr. Sudarshan

M.J., Ms. Paushi Sridhar and Ms. Ramya A.,

Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH

JUDGEMENT

JYOTI SINGH, J.

I.A. 13233/2022 (under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, by Defendant)

1.

Present application has been preferred on behalf of the

Defendant under Order VII Rule 11 read with Section 151 CPC, 1908

seeking rejection of the plaint on two grounds: (a) Plaintiff is legally

disentitled to institute a suit for infringement of DHI marks by virtue

of provisions of Section 53 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999 (hereinafter

referred to as the ‘Act’); and (b) non-joinder of necessary party qua

the claim for disparagement under Pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top