HIGH COURT OF DELHI
PVR LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
IMPERIA WISHFIELD PRIVATE LIMITED – Respondent
ARB.P.-829/2022
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/005052
$~
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 28th October, 2022
Decided on: 23rd November, 2022
+
ARB.P. 829/2022
PVR LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through:
Ms. Sonal Singh, Ms. Sukanya
Lal,
Advocates
(M:7291059010)
versus
IMPERIA WISHFIELD PRIVATE LIMITED ..... Respondent
Through:
Mr. Rishabh Pant, Advocate
(M:9971919424)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
JUDGMENT
%
23.11.2022
MINI PUSHKARNA, J.
1.
The present petition has been filed by the petitioner under
Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
(hereinafter referred to as „the Act‟) seeking appointment of an
arbitrator for adjudication of the disputes that have arisen between the
petitioner and the respondent.
2.
Petitioner is engaged in the business of building, managing,
running and operating multiplex theatres across the country, under
various brand names such as „PVR‟, „PVR Premier‟, „PVR Gold
Class‟. Respondent is engaged in the business of real estate and
development.
Digitally Signed
By:PREETI
Signing Date:23.11.2022
12:41:28
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/005052
3.
A Memorandum Of Understanding dated 06.05.2016 was
executed between the parties for entering into an arrangement for
operating a multiplex having six screens and approximately 1151
seating capacity situated on 3rd and 4th floor of 37th Avenue Mall,
Commercial Complex, Sector 37-C, Gurugram, Haryana.
4.
As per Clause 7(n) of the MOU, the petitioner was to pay an
interest free refundable security deposit to the respondent amounting
to Rs.1,65,00,000/-, which was payable in four stages of different
amounts as follows:
“1. Rs. 27,50,000/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty
Thousand only) within 15 days of signing of the MOU.
2. Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs only) to be
paid Post Legal due diligence and signing of agreement to
lease, which shall be signed after the Developer provides
the application for revised Sanctioned Plans.
3. Rs.55,00,000/- (Rupees Fifty Five Lakhs only) to be
paid on Handover Date which shall be handed over upon
receipt of revised Sanctioned Plans.
4. Rs.27,50,000/- (Rupees Twenty Seven Lakhs Fifty
Thousand) to be paid at the time of signing the lease deed,
which shall be executed at the time of commencement of
commercial operations at Multiplex.”
5.
Rs.27,50,000/- was to be given within 15 days of signing of the
MOU which was duly paid by the petitioner to the respondent on the
execution of the MOU towards security deposit.
6.
Clause 7(y) of the MOU provides for resolution of disputes
between the parties through arbitration. The said Clause is reproduced
as below:
Digitally Signed
By:PREETI
Signing Date:23.11.2022
12:41:28
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/005052
“7(y) Arbitration
Delhi.”
7.
The MOU provided that the parties shall execute an Agreement
to lease within six months from the date of signing of the MOU and
execute a lease deed within 60 days of obtaining occupation
certificate/ any other document required to get Cinema Operating
Licences.
8.
Subsequent to the execution of the MOU, a tripartite agreement
to lease was executed on 18.01.2017 between the petitioner, the
respondent and Prime IT Solutions Pvt. Ltd. (which was the
confirming party). Petitioner in terms of Clause 6.1.2 of the
Agreement to Lease, paid further amount of Rs.42,87,085/- to the
respondent on 25.01.2017. Therefore, total amount of Rs.70,37,085/-
was paid by the petitioner to the respondent towards security deposit.
9.
As per Clause 6.3 of the Agreement to Lease, the respondent
was liable to refund the security deposit amount within a period of one
month from the date of expiry or termination of the Agreement to
Digitally Signed
By:PREETI
Signing Date:23.11.2022
12:41:28
Signature Not Verified
Neutral Citation Number: 2022/DHC/005052
Lease. In case, any dispute