SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. – Appellant
Versus
VIRAT SAXENA – Respondent


CS (COMM) 59/2020

Page 1 of 10

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

Reserved on: 10.11.2022

Date of decision: 25.11.2022

+

CS(COMM) 59/2020 & I.A.1688/2020

SPORTA TECHNOLOGIES PVT. LTD. & ANR. ..... Plaintiffs

Through:

Mr.Prithvi

Singh,

Mr.Rohan

Krishna Sethi and Ms.Parkhi Rai,

Advs.

versus

VIRAT SAXENA

..... Defendant

Through:

None.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA

1. The present suit has been filed seeking a decree of permanent

injunction restraining the defendant, its proprietor, employees, partners,

representatives and/or others acting for and on their behalf from using the

mark ‘Dream11’ or any deceptively similar variant thereof, as a trade

mark, trade name or domain name www.dream11.bet or on social media,

email addresses or in any other manner, which amounts to the

infringement of and/or passing off the plaintiffs’ trade marks as listed in

the

plaint,

such

as

Dream11/

/

/

/

(hereinafter

referred

to

as

‘Dream11 Marks’).

Digitally Signed By:RENUKA

NEGI

Signing Date:28.11.2022

17:11:34

Signature Not Verified

CS (COMM) 59/2020

Page 2 of 10

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

2. The plaintiff no. 1 is a private

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top