HIGH COURT OF DELHI
ITC LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
CENTRAL PARK PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. – Respondent
C.O. (COMM.IPD-TM)-764/2022
2022/DHC/005190
$~24 to 26
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 14th November, 2022
+
C.O.
(COMM.IPD-TM)
763/2022
and
I.A.
18332/2022,
18333/2022
ITC LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Arvind K. Nigam & Mr.
Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocates with
Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Mr. Samik
Mukherjee, Mr. Debjyoti Sarkar, Mr.
Vishal
Nagpal
&
Mr.
Manosij
Mukherjee, Advocates.
versus
CENTRAL PARK ESTATES PRIVATE
LIMITED & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and Ms. Nikita
Anand, Advocates.
25
WITH
+
C.O.
(COMM.IPD-TM)
764/2022
and
I.A.
18334/2022,
18335/2022
ITC LIMITED
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Arvind K. Nigam & Mr.
Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocates with
Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Mr. Samik
Mukherjee, Mr. Debjyoti Sarkar, Mr.
Vishal
Nagpal
&
Mr.
Manosij
Mukherjee, Advocates.
versus
CENTRAL PARK PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. ..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and Ms. Nikita
Anand, Advocates. (M:9810651177)
26
WITH
+
CS (COMM) 781/2022 and I.A. 18326/2022, 18327/2022
ITC LIMITED
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Arvind K. Nigam & Mr.
Rajshekhar Rao, Sr. Advocates with
Digitally Signed
By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
Signing Date:29.11.2022
12:49:23
Signature Not Verified
2022/DHC/005190
Mr. Afzal B. Khan, Mr. Samik
Mukherjee, Mr. Debjyoti Sarkar, Mr.
Vishal
Nagpal
&
Mr.
Manosij
Mukherjee,
Advocates.
(M:9881880037)
versus
CENTRAL PARK ESTATES PRIVATE LIMITED
& ANR.
..... Defendants
Through:
Mr. Peeyoosh Kalra and Ms. Nikita
Anand, Advocates.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present suit has been filed by ITC Limited/Plaintiff against
Central Park Estates Pvt. Ltd. and St. Jerome Hospitality Management
Services Pvt. Ltd./Defendants seeking protection of the Plaintiff’s trademark
‘BUKHARA’ used in respect of restaurant and other hospitality services.
3. The Plaintiff commenced its hospitality business in the year 1975 and
has since then started managing and operating several hotels across the
world. The Plaintiff is stated to be one of India’s foremost private sector
companies with business spanning across diverse sectors such as Fast-
Moving Consumer Goods (FMCG), Hotels, Paperboards and Packaging,
Agri-Business and Information Technology. The Plaintiff is also stated to be
ranked among Asia's 50 best performing companies compiled by Business
Week apart from being recognized by Forbes as one of the World’s Top 250
best regarded companies in 2019.
4. The mark ‘BUKHARA’ was adopted by the Plaintiff for its restaurant
at ITC Maurya Hotel in Chanakyapuri, New Delhi in late 1970s. The said
Digitally Signed
By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
Signing Date:29.11.2022
12:49:23
Signature Not Verified
2022/DHC/005190
restaurant provides various cuisines which are inspired from the North-West
frontier region of India. Over the years, the restaurant has acquired an
enormous reputation owing to various preparations which it had started
serving to its customers. The ‘BUKHARA’ restaurant is also known for its
interiors, decor, layout, arrangement of the restaurant, the cutlery in which
the food is served, the wooden menu cards and the rustic look which it has
maintained over the years. The restaurant uses traditional methods of
cooking such as a clay oven or tandoor. Some of the dishes served in the
‘BUKHARA’ restaurant are globally acclaimed by food critics and the trade.
5. The ‘BUKHARA’ restaurant is stated to have been visited by various
world-renowned celebrities, Presidents, and heads of States. Various chefs
of global repute have also worked at the Plaintiff’s restaurant. Over the
years, the restaurant has also been listed on various food delivery platforms,
third-party service/information provider websites such as Eazy Diner, etc.
The Plaintiff also maintains many websites such as www.itcportal.com, and
www.itchotels.in, that