SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Article Pause Article
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF DELHI
AZAD SINGH – Appellant
Versus
GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-16289/2022



NEUTRAL CITIATION NO. 2022/DHC/005192

W.P.(C) 16289/2022

Page 1 of 14

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Date of order: 25th November 2022

+

W.P.(C) 16289/2022

AZAD SINGH

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr. Pankaj Vivek, Advocate

versus

GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR

..... Respondent

Through:

Ms. Jyoti Tyagi, Advocate

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

O R D E R

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)

CM APPL. 50990/2022

Exemption allowed subject to just exceptions.

The application stands disposed of.

W.P.(C) 16289/2022

1.

The instant civil writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution

of India has been filed seeking the following reliefs:

Digitally Signed By:DAMINI

YADAV

Signing Date:29.11.2022

12:49:56

Signature Not Verified

NEUTRAL CITIATION NO. 2022/DHC/005192

W.P.(C) 16289/2022

Page 2 of 14

Land ln Delhi, 1961, as per his seniority no. 890;”

2.

The Petitioner is an original inhabitant of Village Dhool Siras,

Delhi and was possessed of ancestral agricultural land situated in revenue

estate of Village Dhool Siras, Tehsil Vasant Vihar, District South-West

Delhi. The entire agricultural land belonging to the Petitioner was

acquired by the Government of NCT of Delhi and compensation was paid

to him on 30.11.2002.

3.

The Petitioner was provided with an Application Form with Serial

No. 2642 for allotment of alternative plot in order to seek allotment of

alternative plot under the scheme of Large-Scale Acquisition

Development & Disposal of Land in Delhi, 1961.

4.

A

letter

dated

18th

November

2013 bearing

no.

F.31(55)/41/03/L&B/ALT/13152 was addressed to the Petitioner and

certain documents were sought from the Petitioner. The requisite

documents were submitted by the Petitioner on 23rd December 2012 in

the office of the L&B Department. Thereafter, the case of the Petitioner

was put up in the meeting of Recommendation Committee on 2nd April

2014 and the Committee directed that information be sought from the

LAC and some documents may be furnished by the Petitioner. The

documents sought from the Petitioner were as follows:

a)

Clarification in respect of property no. 249-1, 2nd Floor,

Rama Market, Munirka Village, New Delhi-67

Digitally Signed By:DAMINI

YADAV

Signing Date:29.11.2022

12:49:56

Signature Not Verified

NEUTRAL CITIATION NO. 2022/DHC/005192

W.P.(C) 16289/2022

Page 3 of 14

b)

Status of Kh. No. 228(2-19)

5.

After that another letter dated 29th April 2014 was issued by the

Land and Building Department asking him that if the information asked

for was not submitted before 1st May 2014, the case shall be closed.

Thereafter, the Petitioner immediately wrote a letter on 29th April 2014

requesting for some time to furnish the required information. The

Petitioner submitted the Tehsildar’s report of Kh. No. 228 as well as copy

of rent agreement of property no. 249-1, Rama Market, Munirka Village

to show that the properties were situated in Village Abadi.

6.

Vide letter dated 10th February 2015, the Petitioner was intimated

that his case for allotment of alternative plot has been rejected in the

meeting held on 26th November 2014 on the ground that the Petitioner

had stated that he did not own the property in Village Munirka whereas

he has submitted copy of rent agreement of the said property showing

him as landlord. By representation dated 17th September 2015, the

Petitioner sought a review of his case as the same was rejected due to a

typing error by the Petitioner inasmuch as the Petitioner erroneously

typed that he did not have a property in Village Abadi. It was pleaded by

the Petitioner that if he had any intention to hide the Property No. 249-1,

Rama Market, Munirka Village, New Delhi, then he would not have

submitted copy of the rent agreement showing himself as landlord.

7.

Receiving no reply to his representation dated 17th September

2015, the Petitioner filed a civil writ petition bearing no. 30

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top