HIGH COURT OF DELHI
NISHANT KHATRI – Appellant
Versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-16623/2022
2022/DHC/005413
$~74
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Date of Decision: 5th December, 2022
+
W.P.(C) 16623/2022& CM APPL. 52326/2022
NISHANT KHATRI
..... Petitioner
Through:
Petitioner in person.
versus
BAR COUNCIL OF INDIA & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Preet Pal Singh, Standing Counsel
for R-1.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Prathiba M. Singh, J.(Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The Petitioner - Nishat Khatri seeks directions against the Respondent
No.1 - Bar Council of India (hereinafter, ‘BCI’)in view of the non-conduct
of the All India Bar Examination (`AIBE’).The Petitioner’s concern is that he
ought not to be debarred from practising as an advocate due to the non-
conduct of the AIBE.
3. It is submitted by the Petitioner that in terms of Rules 9 and 10 of the
All India Bar Examination Rules, 2010 (hereinafter, ‘AIBE Rules, 2010’) the
AIBE was introduced by the BCI on 5th June, 2010. The said exam is
mandatory as per Rule 9 of the AIBE Rules, 2010, which provide that no
advocate can practice under Chapter VI of the Advocates Act, 1961 without
clearing the AIBE. Further, the AIBE is to be cleared by an advocate who is
provisionally enrolled within a period of two years from the date of
provisional enrolment.
4. The Petitioner points out that in the minutes of the meeting dated 9th
Digitally Signed
By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
Signing Date:09.12.2022
11:20:22
Signature Not Verified
2022/DHC/005413
August, 2020, a resolution was passed by the of BCI giving exemption from
the said Rule 9 the AIBE Rules, 2010 from 24th March, 2020 to 31st March,
2021 due to the outbreak of the pandemic. Further, the last AIBE was
conducted only in October, 2021 and no exam has been conducted since then.
5. In Civil Appeal No(s). 816-817 titled Bar Council of India v. Twinkle
Rahul Mangaonkar & Ors. the Supreme Court while dealing with certain
issues concerning the AIBE passed order dated 2nd August, 2022 wherein it
clearly records that the BCI had made a statement that the syllabus would be
published within 15 days from the said date and the examination would be
held within a period of about three months thereafter. The said statement was
taken on record. The extract of the said order of the Hon’ble Supreme Court
is set out below:
months thereafter. The statement is taken on record.”
6. The case of the Petitioner is that he got provisionally enrolled with the
Respondent No.2 - Bar Council of Delhi on 19th November, 2019. He admits
that he did not appeared in the exam held on 31st October, 2021, as in
accordance with the AIBE Rules, 2010, he had four attempts in two years in
which he could clear the AIBE. However, since the exam had not been
conducted, he could not exercise his choice of attempting the AIBE.
7. On a query from the Court, Mr. Preetpal Singh, ld. Counsel appearing
for the BCI admits that the last exam was conducted on 31st October, 2021.
However, due to a change in the agency conducting the AIBE, there has been
Digitally Signed
By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
Signing Date:09.12.2022
11:20:22
Signature Not Verified
2022/DHC/005413
a delay in conducting the same. He further submits that in terms of the order
of the Supreme Court, the syllabus of the AIBE has already been published
and the notification regarding the same is likely to be issued shortly.
8. On a query by the Court, as to what would be the position of advocates
who are unable to take the AIBE within two years due the non-conduct of the
examination and whether they would be entitled to practice as advocates, Mr.
Preet Pal Singh, ld. Counsel submits that he would like to seek instructions to
this effect.
9. The Court has considered AIBE Rules, especially Rules 9 and 10. The
same are extracted hereinbelow:
“9.
The All India Bar Examination
10.
(1) The All India Bar Examination shall be
conducted by the Bar Council of India.
Digitally Signed
By:DEVANSHU JOSHI
Sig