HIGH COURT OF DELHI
M/S H.QR.P. LIMITED & ORS – Appellant
Versus
M/S M.T.I LIMITED & ORS – Respondent
CS(OS)-161/2012
NEUTRAL CITATION NO:2022/DHC/005613
CS(OS) 161/2012 Page 1 of 10
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of order : 12th December 2022
+
CS(OS) 161/2012
M/S H.QR.P. LIMITED & ORS
..... Plaintiffs
Through:
Counsel for plaintiffs (appearance
not given)
versus
M/S M.T.I LIMITED & ORS
..... Defendants
Through:
Mr. Amandeep Singh, Advocate
for D-6,10, 11, 12, 20 to 22, 24 to
28
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)
I.A. 4662/2013
1. By way of this application, the defendants no. 11, 12, 20 to 22, 26
to 28 (hereinafter referred to as the ‘applicants’) prays for the stay of the
captioned suit, in accordance with Section 10 of the Code of Civil
Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) inter alia with the
following reliefs:
Digitally Signed By:GAURAV
SHARMA
Signing Date:16.12.2022
17:39:05
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NO:2022/DHC/005613
CS(OS) 161/2012 Page 2 of 10
of said defendants.”
2.
The applicants by way of the present application have taken a plea
that the captioned suit is leading to multiplicity of the proceedings
between the parties, as the issues involved in the captioned suit are also
directly and substantially in issue, in various previously instituted suits
between the same parties or between parties litigating under the same
title.
3. For elaborating their plea so made by way of the instant
application, the applicants have given the following details of the various
suits pending between the parties:
(i) The Defendant No.11 J.J. International Private Limited
had previously filed Company Petition No.255/2010 against
plaintiff No-1 in which it had claimed Rs.2,75,06,870.64
outstanding up to the end of January 2009. In respect of that
claim defendant No-11 had filed complete statement of
account in that petition.
(ii) That defendant No.12 had previously filed a suit for
recovery bearing No. CS (OS) 3057/2011 on the basis of a
loan given to plaintiff No.1 during the period 01.02.2007 to
16.07.2009.
(iii) M/s Acme Resources Limited defendant No.20 had
previously filed a case bearing C.C No.16/01/10 regarding
loan of Rs. Five crores advanced by it to plaintiff No.1 in
Digitally Signed By:GAURAV
SHARMA
Signing Date:16.12.2022
17:39:05
Signature Not Verified
NEUTRAL CITATION NO:2022/DHC/005613
CS(OS) 161/2012 Page 3 of 10
May, 2008 which is the subject matter of the said Complaint
filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act,
1881.
(iv) M/s Abhipra Capital Limited defendant No.21 had
previously filed a Company Petition 476/2009, in respect of
loan of Rs. 25,000,00/- (Twenty Five Lacs) advanced by it to
plaintiff No.1 through cheque in November 2006 which was
repayable with interest @ 18% p.a.
(v) M/s Bathla and Company Pvt. Ltd. Defendant No. 22 had
previously filed a Company Petition 477/2009, against
plaintiff No.1 in respect of Loan of Rs. 10,00,000/- (Ten
Lacs) advanced by it to plaintiff No.1 on 25th November
2006.
(vi) Shri Kanwal Kant Chagti defendant No.26 had
previously filed a suit No-CS(OS) 822/2011 in the High
Court of Delhi in respect of loan of Rs. 49,07,663/- advanced
by it to plaintiff No.1 out of which some money was repaid
by plaintiff No.1 and the balance being Rs-39,80,416.80/-
for which said suit is pending.
(vii) Shri Gulshan Rai (since deceased) defendant No.27 had
previously filed a suit No.CS(OS) 824/2011 in High Court of
Delhi which is pending regarding money advanced to
plaintiff No.1 during the period March 2007 to October 2008
as Share Application money amounting to Rs.1,10,00,000/- (
Digitally Signed By:GAURAV
SHARMA
Signing Date:16.12.2022
17:39:05
Si