NEUTRAL CITATION NO:2022/DHC/005815

Page 1 of 47

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Pronounced on: 23^rd December 2022

+

RFA 454/2022

VIDEOCON INDUSTRIES LIMITED THROUGH ITS RP & ANR.

..... Appellants

Through:

Mr. Jayant K. Mehta, Sr. Advocate

with Mr. Vineet Sinha, Mr. Shaan

Taanu G. Tyagi and Ms. Kaveri,

Advocates

versus

RAM RAJ BHANDARI & ORS.

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. C. Shekhar and Mr. Vibhor

Gupta, Advocates

CORAM:

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH

J U D G M E N T

CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.

1. The instant appeal has been filed under Section 96 of the Code of

Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Code’) read with

Order 43 Rule 1 of the Code, assailing the order dated 21^st March 2022

passed by the learned trial Court whereby, the plaint of the Appellants

herein (hereinafter referred to as ‘plaintiff companies’) was rejected under

Order VII Rule 11(d) of the Code against the Respondents herein.

FACTUAL MATRIX

2. The facts necessary for the disposal of the present appeal are that the

plaintiff companies held 50.21% equity shares in Tirupati Ceramics Limited

Digitally Signed