2022/DHC/005817

LPA 543/2019

Page 1 of 10

$~16

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

+

LPA 543/2019 & CM APPLs. 32791/2019, 32793/2019

DEEPJOT SINGH ANAND

..... Appellant

Through:

Mr. Mahesh K Mehta, Advocate.

versus

UNION OF INDIA & ANR

..... Respondents

Through:

Mr. Sanjay Kumar Pathak, Ms.

K.K.Keran

Pathak,

Mr.

Sunil

Kumar Jha, Mr.M.S.Akhtar,

Mr.Rini V. Tigga, Advocates for R-

1 (UOI).

Mr. Anuj Aggarwal, ASC, GNCTD

along with Ms.Ayushi Bansal and

Mr.Sanyam Suri, Advocates for R-

2 (DOE).

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV

VIBHU BAKHRU, J.

1.

The appellant has filed the present appeal impugning an order

dated 30.05.2019 (hereafter ‘the impugned order’) passed by the

learned Single Judge in L.A. APP.179/2016 captioned Deepjot Singh

v Union of India & Anr. The said appeal was preferred by the

appellant against the order dated 10.05.2016 passed by the learned

Additional District Judge in a reference made at the instance of the

Digitally Signed

By:Dushyant Rawal

Signing Date:23.12.2022

Signature Not Verified

2022/DHC/005817

LPA 543/2019

Page 2 of 10

appellant, under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

(hereafter ‘the Act’) being LAC No.8/10/01 captioned Deepot Singh

v. Union of India.

2.

The Government of NCT of Delhi had acquired the land

admeasuring 156 bigha 15 biswas in Village Tikri Kalan, Delhi. The

notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894

(hereafter ‘the Act’) in respect of the said acquisition was issued on

12.08.1997. This was followed by a notification dated 10.09.1997

under Section 6 of the Act. The Land Acquisition Collector passed an

award (Award No.3/DCW/98-99) dated 15.09.1998 under Section 11

of the Act, determining the value of land at ₹8,80,000/- per acre

(₹1,83,333/- per bigha). The appellant’s land admeasuring 25 bigha

and 13 biswas was also included in the land so acquired. The

possession of the petitioner’s land was taken on 13.11.1997.

3.

The Collector assessed the total value of the appellant’s land at

₹72,51,223.77/- and issued a notice calling upon the appellant to

appear before the concerned officer on 03.11.1998. Apparently, the

appellant did not appear before the concerned officer on that date.

However, he appeared before the concerned officer on 09.11.1988 as

well as on 10.11.1998, and sought release of the admitted amount of

compensation. The appellant also claims that he sent several letters to

the

respondents

seeking

payment

of

admitted

amount

of

compensation.

4.

Since the compensation as admittedly due was not released, the

Digitally Signed

By:Dushyant Rawal

Signing Date:23.12.2022

Signature Not Verified

2022/DHC/005817

LPA 543/2019

Page 3 of 10

appellant filed a petition (CWP No.5463/99) before this Court on

25.08.1999, inter alia, praying that the respondents be directed to

release the admitted amount. The respondents filed the counter-

affidavit claiming that the appellant had not appeared before the

concerned officer and had also not filed the necessary documents.

According to the respondents, the appellant was also responsible for

the delay in disbursement of the compensation.

5.

The compensation was finally paid to the appellant on

20.02.2002. According to the appellant, there was an inordinate delay

in disbursing the compensation and he is entitled to interest for the

said delay. The appellant was also aggrieved with the value of the land

as determined.

6.

The appellant filed a reference under Section 18 of the Act

(LAC No.8/10/01). The said reference was disposed of by the learned

Additional District Judge, by an order dated 10.05.2016. In terms of

t