SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
VINOD RAWAT – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


CRL.M.C. 4584/2022 Page 1 of 11

$~

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Reserved on:15.09.2022

Pronounced on: 20.09.2022

+

CRL.M.C. 4584/2022 & CRL.M.As. 18614/2022 &

18615/2022

VINOD RAWAT

..... Petitioner

Through:

Mr.

S.K.

Tyagi

and

Mr.

Rajeshwar

Singh,

Advocates.

versus

STATE

..... Respondent

Through:

Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the

State with IO SI Esthir, P.S.

Mehrauli.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA

JUDGMENT

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J.

1.

The instant petition has been filed under Sections 482/402

Cr.P.C., 1973 read with Article 227 of Constitution of India for setting

aside the impugned order dated 04.08.2022 passed by learned

Additional Sessions Judge (ASJ) (FTSC) (POCSO) South, Saket, New

Delhi wherein the learned ASJ was pleased to dismiss the application

under Section 311 Cr.P.C. for recalling the witnesses PW-1 Ms. “P”

victim and PW-9 Ms. Sarojini Mukta Minj, Principal, SDMC, Nigam

2022:DHC:3777

CRL.M.C. 4584/2022 Page 2 of 11

Pratibha Vidayalaya Chhatarpur Village 1, New Delhi in FIR bearing

no. 831/2017 under Sections 376/506 of IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act

regis

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top