HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SAGAR SRIVASTAVA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR. – Respondent
W.P.(C)-13513/2022
W.P.(C) 13513/2022
Page 1 of 16
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Date of order: 11th October, 2022
+
W.P.(C) 13513/2022 & CM APPL. 41108/2022
SAGAR SRIVASTAVA
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Tatsat Shukla and Mr. Dhiraj
Kumar, Advocates
versus
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Rajesh Gogna, CGSC with
Ms. Priya Singh, Advocate for R-1
Mr. Rupesh Kumar and Ms.
Pankhuri Shrivastava, Advocates
for NTA
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
O R D E R
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J (Oral)
1. The present petition is being filed by the Petitioner, inter-alia,
seeking the quashing of the final answer key for Set R-5 of NEET(UG)
Exam 2022, which was uploaded on the website of National Testing
Agency (hereinafter referred to as “NTA”) through a press release dated
7th September 2022.
2. The Respondents had launched online portal for registration for
NEET(UG) Exam 2022 and the Petitioner had registered his name for the
same exam. The Respondents uploaded the Admit Card for the
NEET(UG) Exam 2022 and the exam was conducted on 17th July 2022.
2022:DHC:4251
W.P.(C) 13513/2022
Page 2 of 16
3. The provisional answer key along with OMR Sheet and Response
Sheet was uploaded on the official website of NTA on 31st August 2022
with an option to challenge the answer of questions as uploaded on the
website. The Petitioner challenged the provisional answer key vide his
payment ID CPABZYUGY3 dated 1st September 2022.
4. Aggrieved by the non-consideration to his challenge, the Petitioner
has approached this Court by way of the present writ petition.
5. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner has made a
vehement plea that the Respondents have failed to appreciate that the
petitioner herein, being a laborious and hard-working student appeared in
the exam of NEET(UG) 2022 to become a Doctor and for this he has
relied on the contents of the NCERT book of Biology, which even as per
Respondents, is the guiding base for preparing for NEET (UG) Exams.
6. He further submitted that the Petitioner has approached the NTA
for clarification by challenging the provisional answer key as uploaded on
the official website of NTA. However, the Respondents have failed to
consider his challenge submitted online for the three disputed questions
(Q.114, Q.172 and Q.177) of the relevant question paper set.
7. It is submitted that after going through the contents of the book of
Biology of Class 11th and 12th of NCERT, it is apparent that
question/answer keys were incorrect.
8. Learned Counsel for strengthening his arguments has relied on a
judgment of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in Guru Nanak Dev University
v. Saumil Garg, Civil Appeal No. 5276 of 2005decided on 24th August
2005, wherein it was held that:
2022:DHC:4251
W.P.(C) 13513/2022
Page 3 of 16
Lastly, it is submitted that in the above-said discussion on facts as
well as law, the present writ petition may be allowed and inter alia, the
answer key so uploaded by NTA be quashed and set aside.
10.
Per Contra, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Respondent
No. 2, NTA submitted that the combined results of the examinations
conducted on 17th July 2022 and 4th September 2022 were declared on 7th
September 2022 on the official website of NTA, through a Press Release.
To make the examination system transparent, NTA has evolved the
scheme of displaying the Question Paper and Recorded Responses for the
examinees for verification.
11. Further it is submitted that an opportunity was provided to the
candidates to challenge the answer keys formulated by the NTA. The
challenges/objections received are then again placed before the respective
Subject Experts. The objections so received are considered and examined
exhaustively by the Subject Experts of NTA. If the Subject Experts on
examining the objections finds merit in it, then on their advice NT