HIGH COURT OF DELHI
RAVI KUMAR BAJAJ – Appellant
Versus
ASHOK BAJAJ & ORS – Respondent
CM(M)-537/2019
CM(M) 537/2019 & CM(M) 1168/2021
Page 1 of 22
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment Reserved on : 11th January, 2022
Judgment Delivered on : 07th February, 2022
+
CM(M) 537/2019 & CM No. 29207/2019 (for placing on record
additional documents), CM No. 8201/2020 (for permission to file
documents), CM No. 8203/2020 (for condonation of delay of 7 days
in
refiling),
CM
No.
3863/2021(for
evidence),
CM
No.
36780/2021(for
permission
to
file
documents),
CM
No.
38461/2021(for rectification of order dated 20.09.2021), CM No.
38511/2021(for dismissal in limine), CM No. 38513/2021(for
condonation of delay of 97 days in refiling two accompanying CMs),
CM No. 364/2022 (for rectification/modification of order dated
15.11.2021by R-3)
RAVI KUMAR BAJAJ
..... Petitioner
Through:
Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Sr. Advocate
with
Mr.
Wasim
Ashraf
and
Mr.Narender Lodiwal, Advocates.
versus
ASHOK BAJAJ & ORS
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Amit Bhagat & Ms. Arzoo Raj,
Advocates for R-1.
Ms. Gayatri Bajaj, Mr. Siddharth
Bajaj
and
Ms.
Natasha
Bajaj/respondents no. 2, 3 & 4 in
person.
Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocate
for R-5/L&DO.
2022:DHC:483
CM(M) 537/2019 & CM(M) 1168/2021
Page 2 of 22
+
CM(M) 1168/2021 & CM No. 45595/2021(for condonation of delay
in filing), CM No. 45596/2021(for stay)
GAYATRI BAJAJ & ORS.
..... Petitioners
Through:
Ms. Gayatri Bajaj, Mr. Siddharth
Bajaj
and
Ms.
Natasha
Bajaj/petitioners no. 1, 2 & 3 in
person.
versus
RAVI KUMAR BAJAJ & ORS.
..... Respondents
Through:
Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Sr. Advocate
with Mr. Wasim Ashraf and Mr.
Narender Lodiwal, Advocates for
R-1.
Mr. Shankar Kumar Jha, Advocate
for R-5/L&DO.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
JUDGMENT
AMIT BANSAL, J.
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
CM
No.
45595/2021(for
condonation
of
delay
in
filing)
in
CM(M)1168/2021
1.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
CM No. 45596/2021(for stay) in CM(M)1168/2021
2.
The present application has been filed by the petitioner seeking (i)
stay of the proceedings in CM(M) 537/2019; and (ii) that the petition being
CM(M) 1168/2021 be heard and decided first.
2022:DHC:483
CM(M) 537/2019 & CM(M) 1168/2021
Page 3 of 22
3.
Since both the aforesaid petitions, CM(M) 1168/2021 and CM(M)
537/2019 are being heard and decided together, the present application has
become infructuous and is disposed of as such.
CM No. 8203/2020 (for condonation of delay of 7 days in refiling) in
CM(M) 537/2019
4.
For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.
CM No. 29207/2019 (for placing on record additional documents), CM
No. 8201/2020 (for permission to file documents) & CM No.
36780/2021(of R-3 for permission to file documents) in CM(M) 537/2019
5.
For the reasons stated in the applications, the same are allowed.
CM No. 3863/2021(for evidence) in CM(M) 537/2019
6.
This application has been filed for taking evidence to be incorporated
at the stage of oral arguments.
7.
There is no basis for the reliefs claimed in the present application for
taking such evidence in petitions filed under Article 227 of the Constitution
of India.
8.
Accordingly, the application is dismissed.
CM No. 38461/2021(for rectification of order dated 20.09.2021) in
CM(M) 537/2019
9.
The present application has been filed by the applicant/respondent
no.3 seeking rectification of the order dated 20th September, 2021 passed by
this Court.
10.
For the reasons stated in the present application, the application is
partly allowed in respect of the modifications sought in paragraphs 7(b) and
7(c) of the present application.
11.
By the said order, early hearing of CM(M) 537/2019, on an
application filed by the petitioner, being CM No.32616/2021,
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.