HIGH COURT OF DELHI
SATYAJIT BISWAS @ SATTE – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent
CRL.A.-897/2016
CRL.A. 692/2016 & Connected Appeals
Page 1 of 57
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Reserved on: 22nd December 2021
Pronounced on: 14th February 2022
+
CRL.A. 692/2016
AMIT @ SONU JAAT
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Sumeet Verma (DHCLSC)
with Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh,
Advocate
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
+
CRL.A. 815/2016
YASEEN KHAN @ TEHANA
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Sumeet Verma (DHCLSC)
with Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh,
Advocate
versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
+
CRL.A. 892/2016
VICKY @ VIJAY
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Sumeet Verma (DHCLSC)
with Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh,
Advocate
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
+
CRL.A. 894/2016
LUCKY
..... Appellant
2022:DHC:557
CRL.A. 692/2016 & Connected Appeals
Page 2 of 57
Through:
Mr. Sumeet Verma (DHCLSC)
with Mr. Mahinder Pratap Singh,
Advocates
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
+
CRL.A. 897/2016
SATYAJIT BISWAS @ SATTE
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. S.B. Dandapani, DHCLSC
(through VC)
versus
STATE
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
+
CRL.A. 1053/2016
UMASHANKAR
..... Appellant
Through:
Mr. Karan Prakash, DHCLSC
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI
..... Respondent
Through:
Ms. Kusum Dhalla, APP for State
along with W/SI Madhu, P.S.
Jaitpur
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
J U D G M E N T
[VIA VIDEO CONFERENCING]
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J.
1.
The instant criminal appeals under Section 374(2) of the Code of
Criminal Procedure, 1973, (hereinafter “Cr.P.C.”) have been filed against
the impugned judgment dated 16th March 2016 and order on sentence
2022:DHC:557
CRL.A. 692/2016 & Connected Appeals
Page 3 of 57
dated 11th April 2016 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge,
Special Fast Track Court, Southeast District, Saket Court, New Delhi
wherein the Appellants/Accused persons were convicted and sentenced.
2.
Since the criminal appeals bearing number CRL.A.-692/16,
CRL.A.-815/16, CRL.A.-892/16, CRL.A.-894/16, CRL.A.-897/16, and
CRL.A.-1053/16 have arisen out of the same FIR, pertain to the same set
of facts, and have been heard together, therefore the same are being
decided by way of this common judgment.
FACTUAL MATRIX
3.
The brief facts and circumstances that have led to the instant case
are as under:
(i)On 19th May 2012 at about 4:45 P.M., information was received at
Police Control Room that a lady had been raped by many persons
in a truck near Gas Plant, Kalindi Kunj. On receiving the said
information, police team reached on the spot at Agra Canal Road
near Indane Gas Plant. The enquiry was made from the
Prosecutrix/Complainant and her statement was recorded. In her
statement, the Prosecutrix/Complainant stated that she was a rag
picker and used to come from Najafgarh to JJ Colony, Madanpur
Kahdar for rag-picking.
(ii)On 18th May 2012 at about 9:00 P.M., Prosecutrix/Complainant
boarded Gramin Sewa vehicle from Jalebi Chowk, Madanpur
Khadar for going to Nehru Place. The Gramin Sewa vehicle was
2022:DHC:557
CRL.A. 692/2016 & Connected Appeals
Page 4 of 57
driven by one co-accused namely Lucky, while the other co-
accused Tehna was the helper.
(iii)After reaching Nehru Place, all the passengers got down from the
Vehicle, Tehna took the Prosecutrix/Complainant near CNG pump,
Nehru Place, where the Prosecutrix/Complainant was introduced to
Vicky @ Vijay and Satyajeet Biswas @ Satte, who shifted the
Prosecutrix/Complainant into a car forcibly by twisting her arms.
Vicky @ Vijay drove the car and took her nea