FAO 51/2021

$~2

*

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

%

Judgment delivered on: 21^st February, 2022

+

FAO 51/2021& CM APPL. 4514/2021

BANK OF BARODA

..... Appellant

versus

UNION BANK OF INDIA & ORS.

..... Respondents

Advocates who appeared in this case:

For the Appellant:

Mr. Arun Aggarwal, Advocate

For the Respondents: Mr. Saurabh with Mr. Rajiv R. Mishra, Advocate for R-1

Mr. Bhaarat Malhotra, Advocate for R-2

CORAM:-

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV SACHDEVA

JUDGMENT

SANJEEV SACHDEVA, J

1.

The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.

2.

Appellant impugns order dated 10.12.2020 whereby the

application filed by the appellant as also by respondent no. 1 under

Order 39 Rule 4 CPC have been dismissed.

3.

Both applications had sought vacation of order dated

25.02.2013 which had been confirmed by the order dated 13.08.2015.

2022:DHC:657

FAO 51/2021

4.

Notice has been served on respondent No. 3, however, none

appears for respondent no. 3 (defendant No. 2 in the suit). Learned

counsel for the appellant submits that since appellant has already

made the payment of the letter of credit to respondent No. 3,

respondent no. 3