HIGH COURT OF DELHI
TALAIPALLI COAL MINING PVT LTD – Appellant
Versus
NTPC LIMTED – Respondent
ARB.P.-1098/2021
ARB. P. 1098/2021
Page 1 of 27
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Judgment delivered on: 25.02.2022
+
ARB.P. 1098/2021
TALAIPALLI COAL MINING PVT. LTD.
..... Petitioner
versus
NTPC LIMITED
..... Respondent
Advocates who appeared in this case:
For the Petitioner:
Mr Parag P Tripathi, Senior Advocate with
Mr Atul Shanker Mathur, Mr Prabal
Mehrotra, Mr Umang Katariya, Ms Mishika
Bajpai and Mr Amlaan Kumar, Advocates.
For the Respondent:
Mr Puneet Taneja, Ms Laxmi Kumari and
Mr Manmohan Singh Narula Advocates.
CORAM
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE VIBHU BAKHRU
JUDGMENT
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
1.
The petitioner (hereafter ‘TCMPL’) has filed the present petition
under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
(hereafter the ‘A&C Act’) praying that an Arbitrator be appointed on
behalf of the respondent (hereafter ‘NTPC’), in accordance with Clause
23 of the Project Agreement. TCMPL had nominated its Arbitrator and
it further prays that the two Arbitrators (one nominated by TCMPL and
the other as may be appointed by this Court on behalf of NTPC), be
2022:DHC:773
ARB. P. 1098/2021
Page 2 of 27
directed to appoint the Presiding Arbitrator.
Factual Context
2.
On 31.12.2015, NTPC had issued a Notice Inviting Tender
(hereafter ‘NIT’) for the “Development and Operation of the Talaipalli
Coal Block, State of Chhattisgarh, India” and for the appointment of a
Mine Development Operator for the said Coal Block.
2.1
M/s NCC Limited and M/s BGR Mining and Infra Limited
(hereafter referred to as the ‘Consortium Members’) participated in
the tendering process as NCC-BGR Consortium.
2.2
The bid submitted by NCC-BGR Consortium was accepted and
they were declared as the ‘Selected Bidder’. Thereafter, on 13.11.2017,
NTPC issued a Letter of Acceptance (hereafter ‘LoA’) to the NCC-
BGR Consortium.
2.3
In terms of the Instructions to Bidders (hereafter ‘ITB’), the
Consortium Members constituted and incorporated TCMPL as a Joint
Venture Company on 11.12.2017. It is stated in the petition that NTPC
was informed on 12.12.2017 that TCMPL was incorporated by the
Consortium Members as a representative of the Mine Operator.
2.4
Thereafter, on 13.12.2017, the Consortium Members informed
NTPC regarding certain intimations issued by TCMPL on behalf of the
NCC-BGR Consortium. This was followed by certain other
communications issued by TCMPL seeking issuance of a No Objection
Certificate from NTPC for approval of construction of the Diesel Bunk
2022:DHC:773
ARB. P. 1098/2021
Page 3 of 27
in Raikera Village.
2.5
On 14.12.2017, TCMPL requested NTPC to issue a Form-III
certificate as it was proposing to apply for a labour license for the
Talaipalli Coal Mining Project operations.
2.6
NTPC states that after issuance of the LoA, the Central Bureau
of Investigation (CBI) registered an FIR (being FIR No. RC AC1 2017
A0007 dated 07.12.2017) against one of the directors of M/s BGR
Mining and Infra Limited under various provisions of the Indian Penal
Code, 1860 and the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. NTPC states
that in view of the registration of the FIR, it did not recognise the
incorporation of TCMPL and declined to sign the Project Agreement
with TCMPL.
2.7
However, TCMPL contends to the contrary. It relies upon a letter
dated 19.12.2017 addressed by NTPC to TCMPL conveying it’s‘No
Objection’ for construction of a Diesel Bunk in Raikera Village. It also
claims that NTPC had issued a Form-III certificate to TCMPL for
obtaining a labour license under the provisions of the Contract Labour
(Regulation and Abolition) Act, 1970 and its relevant rules. However,
NTPC had thereafter, on 26.12.2017, called upon TCMPL to return the
original copy of the Form-III certificate and to desist from seeking any
license on the strength of th