HIGH COURT OF DELHI
FRANKFINN ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ORS. – Respondent
CS(COMM)-192/2021
Page 1 of 27
*
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
%
Pronounced on: 2nd March, 2022
+
CS(COMM) 192/2021, I.A.5727/2021 (by the plaintiff u/O
XXXIX R- 1 & 2 CPC), I.A.6086/2021 (by the plaintiff u/O
XXXIX R-2A CPC), I.A. 6250/2021 (by the proposed D-4 u/O I
Rule 10 CPC), I.A. 7062/2021 (by the D-l u/O XXXIX R-4
CPC) and I.A.7691/2021 (by the plaintiff u/O XXXIX R-2A)
FRANKFINN ENTERTAINMENT COMPANY PVT. LTD.
..... Plaintiff
Through:
Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, Senior
Advocate with Mr. Kapil Midha,
Ms. Pritika Juneja and Ms. Versha
Singh, Advocates
Versus
UNISYS INFOSOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. & ORS. .....Defendants
Through:
Mr. Asutosh Lohia, Mr. Rohan
Dewan
and
Ms.Shraddha
Bhargava, Advocates for D-1
Mr. Arjun Natarajan, Mr. Mayank
Sapra and Ms. Lakshmi Kant
Srivastava, Advocates for D-2
Mr. Aditya Gupta and Ms.Aishwarya
Kane and Mr. Raunaq Kamath,
Advocates for D-3
Mr. Sagar Chandra, Ms. Sakshi
Pande and Ms. Urvashi Garg,
Advocates for applicant/proposed
D-4 in I.A. 6250/2021
2022:DHC:778
Page 2 of 27
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE ASHA MENON
O R D E R
1.
This order will dispose of five applications, namely, (i)
I.A.5727/2021 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX Rules 1 & 2
CPC, (ii) I.A.6086/2021 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX R-2A
CPC, (iii) I.A.7691/2021 filed by the plaintiff under Order XXXIX R-2A
CPC, (iv) I.A.7062/2021 filed by the defendant No.1 under Order
XXXIX Rule 4 CPC, and (v) I.A.6250/2021 filed by the applicant/Indya
Records and Films Private Limited (i.e., proposed defendant No.4) under
Order I Rule 10 CPC for impleadment.
2.
Before proceeding further, a few facts may be noted. The plaintiff
is an integrated Media and Entertainment Company and is a part of a
Group Company division, namely, „Frankfinn Institute of Air Hostess
Training‟, which is a reputed organization, engaged in the field of
imparting trainings in the field of Aviation, Hospitality, Travel
Management and Customer Services. It claims to have set up the largest
network of „State of the Art‟ Cent res in India and built a formidable
reputation for quality training, earning several awards. Since 2007, it has
also entered the arena of music and had its first home entertainment
release. It has also produced a movie named, “SAT SRI AKAL”, which
was released in the year 2008 in theatres and later, on VCD/DVD and
thereafter, on Netflix. Thus, over a period of time, the plaintiff has also
2022:DHC:778
Page 3 of 27
established a name in the field of religious preaching, music and home
entertainment and claims to have emerged as a leading player in Shabad
Gurbani videos and audios.
3.
Mr. Sanjeev Sindhwani, learned senior counsel for the plaintiff,
submitted that the defendant No.3/Google LLC is an online video sharing
platform, allowing users to upload, view, rate, share, etc., videos and
create channels for uploading various contents. The defendant No.2-
M/s.Indya Records, through its proprietor Mr.Kanwal Deep Kohli,
created a YouTube channel, initially called, „Divine Amrit Bani‟ for and
on behalf of the plaintiff. The content for uploading on the said channel
was provided solely by the plaintiff. The YouTube channel was renamed
“Shabad Kirtan Gurbani –Divine Amrit Bani” having URL
www.youtube.com/user/divineamritbani (hereinafter referred to as the
“Suit Channel”), and is available on the platform of defendant No.3.
4.
According to the plaintiff, the defendant No.2 used to manage the
Suit Channel for the plaintiff and there was no doubt about the ownership
of the channel vesting with the plaintiff. However, the defendant No.1 has
unlawfully started asserting ownership rights in respect of the Suit
Channel, on the basis of some arrangement with the defendant No.2,
which was also only to manage the Suit Channel. This was evident from
the „About Section‟, which showed the plaintiff as the rightful owner and
the employees of the plaintiff a